Comments on: WHAT’S ON SECOND? The Japanese are Coming, Part III http://seamheads.com/2007/12/14/what%e2%80%99s-on-second-the-japanese-are-coming-part-iii/ Mon, 21 May 2012 16:32:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: KJOK http://seamheads.com/2007/12/14/what%e2%80%99s-on-second-the-japanese-are-coming-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-222 KJOK Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:04:45 +0000 http://seamheads.com/blog/2007/12/14/what%e2%80%99s-on-second-the-japanese-are-coming-part-iii/#comment-222 Jim Albright has his MLE's posted at: http://baseballguru.com/jalbright/analysisjalbright40.html Jim was one of the guys that got me interested in doing Japanese MLE's. I think his batting MLE method results are very similar to mine, although he takes the empirical 'shortcut' method to get there as opposed to my theoretical step by step method. On pitchers, however, he basically flips the batting adjustments over, which as I've shown in my previous articles is wrong, and gives him MLE's for pitchers that are much worse than they should be.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('222','KJOK'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('222','KJOK','Jim Albright has his MLE\'s posted at:\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/baseballguru.com\/jalbright\/analysisjalbright40.html\r\n\r\nJim was one of the guys that got me interested in doing Japanese MLE\'s. I think his batting MLE method results are very similar to mine, although he takes the empirical \'shortcut\' method to get there as opposed to my theoretical step by step method. On pitchers, however, he basically flips the batting adjustments over, which as I\'ve shown in my previous articles is wrong, and gives him MLE\'s for pitchers that are much worse than they should be.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Jim Albright has his MLE’s posted at:

http://baseballguru.com/jalbright/analysisjalbright40.html

Jim was one of the guys that got me interested in doing Japanese MLE’s. I think his batting MLE method results are very similar to mine, although he takes the empirical ‘shortcut’ method to get there as opposed to my theoretical step by step method. On pitchers, however, he basically flips the batting adjustments over, which as I’ve shown in my previous articles is wrong, and gives him MLE’s for pitchers that are much worse than they should be.

Reply – Quote
]]>