Comments on: Twenty-Seven Up and Twenty-Seven Down: The Two Perfect Games of 1880 http://seamheads.com/2008/05/02/twenty-seven-up-and-twenty-seven-down-the-two-perfect-games-of-1880/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:10:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mike Lynch http://seamheads.com/2008/05/02/twenty-seven-up-and-twenty-seven-down-the-two-perfect-games-of-1880/comment-page-1/#comment-1429 Mike Lynch Sat, 03 May 2008 19:12:33 +0000 http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/05/02/twenty-seven-up-and-twenty-seven-down-the-two-perfect-games-of-1880/#comment-1429 Boy, Jim McCormick sure got screwed. How'd you like to give up only three hits and a walk in eight innings and lose? Secondly, it's interesting that Worcester's only run came on an error, considering Cleveland had the second best fielding percentage in the NL that year. Good stuff, Brendan!<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1429','Mike Lynch'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1429','Mike Lynch','Boy, Jim McCormick sure got screwed. How\'d you like to give up only three hits and a walk in eight innings and lose? Secondly, it\'s interesting that Worcester\'s only run came on an error, considering Cleveland had the second best fielding percentage in the NL that year.\r\n\r\nGood stuff, Brendan!'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Boy, Jim McCormick sure got screwed. How’d you like to give up only three hits and a walk in eight innings and lose? Secondly, it’s interesting that Worcester’s only run came on an error, considering Cleveland had the second best fielding percentage in the NL that year.

Good stuff, Brendan!

Reply – Quote
]]>