<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ted Williams: The Greatest Hitter Who Ever Lived</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike b</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-23209</link>
		<dc:creator>mike b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-23209</guid>
		<description>the way that i figured ted williams home runs totals for the missing years was easy,i added up the total homers for the 40, 41 ,42 and the 46, 47, 48 seasons, i took that total and divided it by 6 and i came up with a safe average of 31 homers that i used to fill in those 3 missing years....i then added his homers for the 50,51 and the 54, 55 seasons and came up with 28 homers averaged and got a total of 28 that i filled in the 52,53 seasons with...&quot;i hope i&#039;m not confusing anyone&quot;...so now we have to add 31x3 with 28x2, which is 151 homers added to his 521 total...and now its safe to say that had he stayed &quot;in the game&quot; those missing years, he would have had &quot;at least&quot; a total of 672 !!! so he would be 4th!!! instead of tied for 18th!!!...surely he was in his prime those missing years and probably would have hit a little higher than the numbers i came up with &quot;and&quot; he wouldnt have been emotionally changed by &quot;war&quot;, which would and should somehow also factor in !!!...maybe we could say he &quot;might&quot; have hit 700 home runs.......&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;23209&#039;,&#039;mike b&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;23209&#039;,&#039;mike b&#039;,&#039;the way that i figured ted williams home runs totals for the missing years was easy,i added up the total homers for the 40, 41 ,42 and the 46, 47, 48 seasons, i took that total and divided it by 6 and i came up with a safe average of 31 homers that i used to fill in those 3 missing years....i then added his homers for the 50,51 and the 54, 55 seasons and came up with 28 homers averaged and got a total of 28 that i filled in the 52,53 seasons with...\&quot;i hope i\&#039;m not confusing anyone\&quot;...so now we have to add 31x3 with 28x2, which is 151 homers added to his 521 total...and now its safe to say that had he stayed \&quot;in the game\&quot; those missing years, he would have had \&quot;at least\&quot; a total of 672 !!! so he would be 4th!!! instead of tied for 18th!!!...surely he was in his prime those missing years and probably would have hit a little higher than the numbers i came up with \&quot;and\&quot; he wouldnt have been emotionally changed by \&quot;war\&quot;, which would and should somehow also factor in !!!...maybe we could say he \&quot;might\&quot; have hit 700 home runs.......&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the way that i figured ted williams home runs totals for the missing years was easy,i added up the total homers for the 40, 41 ,42 and the 46, 47, 48 seasons, i took that total and divided it by 6 and i came up with a safe average of 31 homers that i used to fill in those 3 missing years&#8230;.i then added his homers for the 50,51 and the 54, 55 seasons and came up with 28 homers averaged and got a total of 28 that i filled in the 52,53 seasons with&#8230;&#8221;i hope i&#8217;m not confusing anyone&#8221;&#8230;so now we have to add 31&#215;3 with 28&#215;2, which is 151 homers added to his 521 total&#8230;and now its safe to say that had he stayed &#8220;in the game&#8221; those missing years, he would have had &#8220;at least&#8221; a total of 672 !!! so he would be 4th!!! instead of tied for 18th!!!&#8230;surely he was in his prime those missing years and probably would have hit a little higher than the numbers i came up with &#8220;and&#8221; he wouldnt have been emotionally changed by &#8220;war&#8221;, which would and should somehow also factor in !!!&#8230;maybe we could say he &#8220;might&#8221; have hit 700 home runs&#8230;&#8230;.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('23209','mike b'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('23209','mike b','the way that i figured ted williams home runs totals for the missing years was easy,i added up the total homers for the 40, 41 ,42 and the 46, 47, 48 seasons, i took that total and divided it by 6 and i came up with a safe average of 31 homers that i used to fill in those 3 missing years....i then added his homers for the 50,51 and the 54, 55 seasons and came up with 28 homers averaged and got a total of 28 that i filled in the 52,53 seasons with...\&quot;i hope i\'m not confusing anyone\&quot;...so now we have to add 31x3 with 28x2, which is 151 homers added to his 521 total...and now its safe to say that had he stayed \&quot;in the game\&quot; those missing years, he would have had \&quot;at least\&quot; a total of 672 !!! so he would be 4th!!! instead of tied for 18th!!!...surely he was in his prime those missing years and probably would have hit a little higher than the numbers i came up with \&quot;and\&quot; he wouldnt have been emotionally changed by \&quot;war\&quot;, which would and should somehow also factor in !!!...maybe we could say he \&quot;might\&quot; have hit 700 home runs.......'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Increasing Clouds with a Greater Chance of Hits</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-22890</link>
		<dc:creator>Increasing Clouds with a Greater Chance of Hits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-22890</guid>
		<description>[...] sports. &#8221; That being the case (and who are we to argue with the man whom many consider to be the greatest hitter who ever lived), baseball players at all levels would be wise to check out the study published in the latest issue [...]&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;22890&#039;,&#039;Increasing Clouds with a Greater Chance of Hits&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;22890&#039;,&#039;Increasing Clouds with a Greater Chance of Hits&#039;,&#039;&#091;...&#093; sports. &#8221; That being the case (and who are we to argue with the man whom many consider to be the greatest hitter who ever lived), baseball players at all levels would be wise to check out the study published in the latest issue &#091;...&#093;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sports. &#8221; That being the case (and who are we to argue with the man whom many consider to be the greatest hitter who ever lived), baseball players at all levels would be wise to check out the study published in the latest issue [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('22890','Increasing Clouds with a Greater Chance of Hits'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('22890','Increasing Clouds with a Greater Chance of Hits','&amp;#91;...&amp;#93; sports. &amp;#8221; That being the case (and who are we to argue with the man whom many consider to be the greatest hitter who ever lived), baseball players at all levels would be wise to check out the study published in the latest issue &amp;#91;...&amp;#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIKESOWELL</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-9574</link>
		<dc:creator>MIKESOWELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-9574</guid>
		<description>Hey. Sorry it took so long to respond. No I am not the Author Mike Sowell. In fact, if you saw me in person, you may be quite surprised, but I digress. To me, Williams stood a great chance had he not had his career interrupted by war service. I think an underrated statistic that is not followed enough is Homerun/At Bat Ratio. I think people would be shocked to find out that Williams ratio (14.8) is lower than Mickey Mantle, Jimmie Foxx,Mike Schmidt, Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, Reggie Jackson and countless others. In fact, he ranks ninth all time. As you noted, he would be facing inferior pitching. Now he probably would be walked more, but his percentage of good pitches per at bat would be higher to offset this. All in all, I see Williams, barring injuries with at least 175 more Home Runs.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;9574&#039;,&#039;MIKESOWELL&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;9574&#039;,&#039;MIKESOWELL&#039;,&#039;Hey. Sorry it took so long to respond. No I am not the Author Mike Sowell. In fact, if you saw me in person, you may be quite surprised, but I digress. To me, Williams stood a great chance had he not had his career interrupted by war service. I think an underrated statistic that is not followed enough is Homerun\/At Bat Ratio. I think people would be shocked to find out that Williams ratio (14.8) is lower than Mickey Mantle, Jimmie Foxx,Mike Schmidt, Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, Reggie Jackson and countless others. In fact, he ranks ninth all time. As you noted, he would be facing inferior pitching. Now he probably would be walked more, but his percentage of good pitches per at bat would be higher to offset this. All in all, I see Williams, barring injuries with at least 175 more Home Runs.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey. Sorry it took so long to respond. No I am not the Author Mike Sowell. In fact, if you saw me in person, you may be quite surprised, but I digress. To me, Williams stood a great chance had he not had his career interrupted by war service. I think an underrated statistic that is not followed enough is Homerun/At Bat Ratio. I think people would be shocked to find out that Williams ratio (14.8) is lower than Mickey Mantle, Jimmie Foxx,Mike Schmidt, Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, Reggie Jackson and countless others. In fact, he ranks ninth all time. As you noted, he would be facing inferior pitching. Now he probably would be walked more, but his percentage of good pitches per at bat would be higher to offset this. All in all, I see Williams, barring injuries with at least 175 more Home Runs.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('9574','MIKESOWELL'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('9574','MIKESOWELL','Hey. Sorry it took so long to respond. No I am not the Author Mike Sowell. In fact, if you saw me in person, you may be quite surprised, but I digress. To me, Williams stood a great chance had he not had his career interrupted by war service. I think an underrated statistic that is not followed enough is Homerun\/At Bat Ratio. I think people would be shocked to find out that Williams ratio (14.8) is lower than Mickey Mantle, Jimmie Foxx,Mike Schmidt, Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, Reggie Jackson and countless others. In fact, he ranks ninth all time. As you noted, he would be facing inferior pitching. Now he probably would be walked more, but his percentage of good pitches per at bat would be higher to offset this. All in all, I see Williams, barring injuries with at least 175 more Home Runs.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIKESOWELL</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-4541</link>
		<dc:creator>MIKESOWELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-4541</guid>
		<description>Babe Ruth is the greatest hitter of all time STATISTICALLY. Had he been a Batter full time instead of a Pitcher from 1914-18 even during the dead ball era, you have to give the Bambino at least 60 extra homeruns.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;4541&#039;,&#039;MIKESOWELL&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;4541&#039;,&#039;MIKESOWELL&#039;,&#039;Babe Ruth is the greatest hitter of all time STATISTICALLY. Had he been a Batter full time instead of a Pitcher from 1914-18 even during the dead ball era, you have to give the Bambino at least 60 extra homeruns.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babe Ruth is the greatest hitter of all time STATISTICALLY. Had he been a Batter full time instead of a Pitcher from 1914-18 even during the dead ball era, you have to give the Bambino at least 60 extra homeruns.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('4541','MIKESOWELL'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('4541','MIKESOWELL','Babe Ruth is the greatest hitter of all time STATISTICALLY. Had he been a Batter full time instead of a Pitcher from 1914-18 even during the dead ball era, you have to give the Bambino at least 60 extra homeruns.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerryt</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-4118</link>
		<dc:creator>gerryt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-4118</guid>
		<description>A highly readable description of what might have been.  The Boston media made Ted&#039;s life miserable during his entire career, else he might have done even better, and been more content.   Interesting point Re: Babe&#039;s time as a pitcher, during which he hit very well.

I like the Babe and Ted as the two greatest hitters who ever lived, and that they both played in Red Sox uniforms at Fenway, with Chicago, the last great American Cathedral now that the Steinbrenners have replaced the House that Babe Built.  I also like that instead of steroids they smoked and drank in the dugout.  These two stand alone.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;4118&#039;,&#039;gerryt&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;4118&#039;,&#039;gerryt&#039;,&#039;A highly readable description of what might have been.  The Boston media made Ted\&#039;s life miserable during his entire career, else he might have done even better, and been more content.   Interesting point Re: Babe\&#039;s time as a pitcher, during which he hit very well.\r\n\r\nI like the Babe and Ted as the two greatest hitters who ever lived, and that they both played in Red Sox uniforms at Fenway, with Chicago, the last great American Cathedral now that the Steinbrenners have replaced the House that Babe Built.  I also like that instead of steroids they smoked and drank in the dugout.  These two stand alone.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A highly readable description of what might have been.  The Boston media made Ted&#8217;s life miserable during his entire career, else he might have done even better, and been more content.   Interesting point Re: Babe&#8217;s time as a pitcher, during which he hit very well.</p>
<p>I like the Babe and Ted as the two greatest hitters who ever lived, and that they both played in Red Sox uniforms at Fenway, with Chicago, the last great American Cathedral now that the Steinbrenners have replaced the House that Babe Built.  I also like that instead of steroids they smoked and drank in the dugout.  These two stand alone.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('4118','gerryt'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('4118','gerryt','A highly readable description of what might have been.  The Boston media made Ted\'s life miserable during his entire career, else he might have done even better, and been more content.   Interesting point Re: Babe\'s time as a pitcher, during which he hit very well.\r\n\r\nI like the Babe and Ted as the two greatest hitters who ever lived, and that they both played in Red Sox uniforms at Fenway, with Chicago, the last great American Cathedral now that the Steinbrenners have replaced the House that Babe Built.  I also like that instead of steroids they smoked and drank in the dugout.  These two stand alone.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hoban</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-4092</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hoban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-4092</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Interesting.  And not bad as far as speculation goes.  Ted missed some serious years in the military.  But why not try your simulation on the years that the Babe &quot;missed&quot; as a pitcher?  You will come to the same conclusion that all serious students of the game must.

Babe Ruth was the greatest hitter of all time.

Mike&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;4092&#039;,&#039;Mike Hoban&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;4092&#039;,&#039;Mike Hoban&#039;,&#039;Mike,\r\n\r\nInteresting.  And not bad as far as speculation goes.  Ted missed some serious years in the military.  But why not try your simulation on the years that the Babe \&quot;missed\&quot; as a pitcher?  You will come to the same conclusion that all serious students of the game must.\r\n\r\nBabe Ruth was the greatest hitter of all time.\r\n\r\nMike&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Interesting.  And not bad as far as speculation goes.  Ted missed some serious years in the military.  But why not try your simulation on the years that the Babe &#8220;missed&#8221; as a pitcher?  You will come to the same conclusion that all serious students of the game must.</p>
<p>Babe Ruth was the greatest hitter of all time.</p>
<p>Mike
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('4092','Mike Hoban'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('4092','Mike Hoban','Mike,\r\n\r\nInteresting.  And not bad as far as speculation goes.  Ted missed some serious years in the military.  But why not try your simulation on the years that the Babe \&quot;missed\&quot; as a pitcher?  You will come to the same conclusion that all serious students of the game must.\r\n\r\nBabe Ruth was the greatest hitter of all time.\r\n\r\nMike'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william russo</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>william russo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>I have been following baseball since the late 1940&#039;s and during that time, no one has come close to matching Ted&#039;s combination of High power and high average.  

His homer total for the five missed years certainly would be at least 150 and perhaps as many as 200.  There&#039;s a good chance that he would have finished with nore than 714.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;1761&#039;,&#039;william russo&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;1761&#039;,&#039;william russo&#039;,&#039;I have been following baseball since the late 1940\&#039;s and during that time, no one has come close to matching Ted\&#039;s combination of High power and high average.  \r\n\r\nHis homer total for the five missed years certainly would be at least 150 and perhaps as many as 200.  There\&#039;s a good chance that he would have finished with nore than 714.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been following baseball since the late 1940&#8242;s and during that time, no one has come close to matching Ted&#8217;s combination of High power and high average.  </p>
<p>His homer total for the five missed years certainly would be at least 150 and perhaps as many as 200.  There&#8217;s a good chance that he would have finished with nore than 714.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1761','william russo'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1761','william russo','I have been following baseball since the late 1940\'s and during that time, no one has come close to matching Ted\'s combination of High power and high average.  \r\n\r\nHis homer total for the five missed years certainly would be at least 150 and perhaps as many as 200.  There\'s a good chance that he would have finished with nore than 714.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al read</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>al read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 01:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>What if he never joined the military...Great numbers and probably not that far fetched&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;1261&#039;,&#039;al read&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;1261&#039;,&#039;al read&#039;,&#039;What if he never joined the military...Great numbers and probably not that far fetched&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if he never joined the military&#8230;Great numbers and probably not that far fetched
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1261','al read'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1261','al read','What if he never joined the military...Great numbers and probably not that far fetched'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idetrorce</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Idetrorce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>very interesting, but I don&#039;t agree with you 
Idetrorce&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;153&#039;,&#039;Idetrorce&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;153&#039;,&#039;Idetrorce&#039;,&#039;very interesting, but I don\&#039;t agree with you \r\nIdetrorce&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, but I don&#8217;t agree with you<br />
Idetrorce
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('153','Idetrorce'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('153','Idetrorce','very interesting, but I don\'t agree with you \r\nIdetrorce'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lynch</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Thanks for the feedback.  I didn&#039;t assign arbitrary home run numbers to Williams, nor did I project them, I ran a computer simulation that split them out.  Granted I had to enter his statistics into the computer that were used during the 1943-1945 seasons and I had to make a guess as to what they would have been.  I ran this simulation about eight years ago and I no longer have the program that I used, but I&#039;m pretty sure I assigned about 35 homers to him in 1943 and went from there.  I based his numbers on his averages from the seasons that sandwiched 1943-1945.  Secondly, and I should have explained this better, Williams was the only player I &quot;brought back&quot; from WWII, so he was facing depleted pitching staffs, which surely helped his numbers.  I could have pretended there was no war and entered stats for all the players, but frankly, I didn&#039;t want to go to that length.  Lastly, authors and historians Dick Johnson and Glenn Stout projected his stats filling in the numbers from the 727 games he missed and the numbers my computer simulation spit out are very similar to their projections.  Runs differed by only 55, hits by only 20, and doubles, triples, walks, and strikeouts were almost identical.  Homers differed by 49 (Johnson and Stout projected those to 686) and RBIs by 214, so your point about his 50-homer seasons is well taken.  I may try running the simulation again with Out Of The Park Baseball, which has a career feature that will adjust Williams&#039; ratings based on his career to the point he went into the service.  That may be more accurate and less optimistic, but I&#039;m pretty happy with Micro League Baseball&#039;s results.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;33&#039;,&#039;Mike Lynch&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;33&#039;,&#039;Mike Lynch&#039;,&#039;Mark,\r\n\r\nThanks for the feedback.  I didn\&#039;t assign arbitrary home run numbers to Williams, nor did I project them, I ran a computer simulation that split them out.  Granted I had to enter his statistics into the computer that were used during the 1943-1945 seasons and I had to make a guess as to what they would have been.  I ran this simulation about eight years ago and I no longer have the program that I used, but I\&#039;m pretty sure I assigned about 35 homers to him in 1943 and went from there.  I based his numbers on his averages from the seasons that sandwiched 1943-1945.  Secondly, and I should have explained this better, Williams was the only player I \&quot;brought back\&quot; from WWII, so he was facing depleted pitching staffs, which surely helped his numbers.  I could have pretended there was no war and entered stats for all the players, but frankly, I didn\&#039;t want to go to that length.  Lastly, authors and historians Dick Johnson and Glenn Stout projected his stats filling in the numbers from the 727 games he missed and the numbers my computer simulation spit out are very similar to their projections.  Runs differed by only 55, hits by only 20, and doubles, triples, walks, and strikeouts were almost identical.  Homers differed by 49 (Johnson and Stout projected those to 686) and RBIs by 214, so your point about his 50-homer seasons is well taken.  I may try running the simulation again with Out Of The Park Baseball, which has a career feature that will adjust Williams\&#039; ratings based on his career to the point he went into the service.  That may be more accurate and less optimistic, but I\&#039;m pretty happy with Micro League Baseball\&#039;s results.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback.  I didn&#8217;t assign arbitrary home run numbers to Williams, nor did I project them, I ran a computer simulation that split them out.  Granted I had to enter his statistics into the computer that were used during the 1943-1945 seasons and I had to make a guess as to what they would have been.  I ran this simulation about eight years ago and I no longer have the program that I used, but I&#8217;m pretty sure I assigned about 35 homers to him in 1943 and went from there.  I based his numbers on his averages from the seasons that sandwiched 1943-1945.  Secondly, and I should have explained this better, Williams was the only player I &#8220;brought back&#8221; from WWII, so he was facing depleted pitching staffs, which surely helped his numbers.  I could have pretended there was no war and entered stats for all the players, but frankly, I didn&#8217;t want to go to that length.  Lastly, authors and historians Dick Johnson and Glenn Stout projected his stats filling in the numbers from the 727 games he missed and the numbers my computer simulation spit out are very similar to their projections.  Runs differed by only 55, hits by only 20, and doubles, triples, walks, and strikeouts were almost identical.  Homers differed by 49 (Johnson and Stout projected those to 686) and RBIs by 214, so your point about his 50-homer seasons is well taken.  I may try running the simulation again with Out Of The Park Baseball, which has a career feature that will adjust Williams&#8217; ratings based on his career to the point he went into the service.  That may be more accurate and less optimistic, but I&#8217;m pretty happy with Micro League Baseball&#8217;s results.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('33','Mike Lynch'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('33','Mike Lynch','Mark,\r\n\r\nThanks for the feedback.  I didn\'t assign arbitrary home run numbers to Williams, nor did I project them, I ran a computer simulation that split them out.  Granted I had to enter his statistics into the computer that were used during the 1943-1945 seasons and I had to make a guess as to what they would have been.  I ran this simulation about eight years ago and I no longer have the program that I used, but I\'m pretty sure I assigned about 35 homers to him in 1943 and went from there.  I based his numbers on his averages from the seasons that sandwiched 1943-1945.  Secondly, and I should have explained this better, Williams was the only player I \&quot;brought back\&quot; from WWII, so he was facing depleted pitching staffs, which surely helped his numbers.  I could have pretended there was no war and entered stats for all the players, but frankly, I didn\'t want to go to that length.  Lastly, authors and historians Dick Johnson and Glenn Stout projected his stats filling in the numbers from the 727 games he missed and the numbers my computer simulation spit out are very similar to their projections.  Runs differed by only 55, hits by only 20, and doubles, triples, walks, and strikeouts were almost identical.  Homers differed by 49 (Johnson and Stout projected those to 686) and RBIs by 214, so your point about his 50-homer seasons is well taken.  I may try running the simulation again with Out Of The Park Baseball, which has a career feature that will adjust Williams\' ratings based on his career to the point he went into the service.  That may be more accurate and less optimistic, but I\'m pretty happy with Micro League Baseball\'s results.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://seamheads.com/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 04:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/11/05/ted-williams-the-greatest-hitter-who-ever-lived/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s fine if you want to project his stats for the time he missed, but be realistic, especially in HR&#039;s. His career high is 43, which was the only time he hit over 40. You have him hitting 43 again, 50, then 59. It just wouldn&#039;t happen. You can&#039;t just assume he has his best years in his career when he actually didn&#039;t play. I know your point is to say he is the best ever, but the argument gets lost being so optimistic. If you put in conservative data, (which is still great) you will present a stronger case since people just won&#039;t disregard what your saying.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;32&#039;,&#039;Mark&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;32&#039;,&#039;Mark&#039;,&#039;It\&#039;s fine if you want to project his stats for the time he missed, but be realistic, especially in HR\&#039;s. His career high is 43, which was the only time he hit over 40. You have him hitting 43 again, 50, then 59. It just wouldn\&#039;t happen. You can\&#039;t just assume he has his best years in his career when he actually didn\&#039;t play. I know your point is to say he is the best ever, but the argument gets lost being so optimistic. If you put in conservative data, (which is still great) you will present a stronger case since people just won\&#039;t disregard what your saying.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fine if you want to project his stats for the time he missed, but be realistic, especially in HR&#8217;s. His career high is 43, which was the only time he hit over 40. You have him hitting 43 again, 50, then 59. It just wouldn&#8217;t happen. You can&#8217;t just assume he has his best years in his career when he actually didn&#8217;t play. I know your point is to say he is the best ever, but the argument gets lost being so optimistic. If you put in conservative data, (which is still great) you will present a stronger case since people just won&#8217;t disregard what your saying.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('32','Mark'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('32','Mark','It\'s fine if you want to project his stats for the time he missed, but be realistic, especially in HR\'s. His career high is 43, which was the only time he hit over 40. You have him hitting 43 again, 50, then 59. It just wouldn\'t happen. You can\'t just assume he has his best years in his career when he actually didn\'t play. I know your point is to say he is the best ever, but the argument gets lost being so optimistic. If you put in conservative data, (which is still great) you will present a stronger case since people just won\'t disregard what your saying.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

