Comments on: The 2010 HOF Ballot – The Case for Roberto Alomar http://seamheads.com/2009/12/18/the-2010-hof-ballot-%e2%80%93-the-case-for-roberto-alomar/ Wed, 23 May 2012 23:56:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Mike Hoban http://seamheads.com/2009/12/18/the-2010-hof-ballot-%e2%80%93-the-case-for-roberto-alomar/comment-page-1/#comment-15641 Mike Hoban Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:58:28 +0000 http://seamheads.com/blog/2009/12/18/the-2010-hof-ballot-%e2%80%93-the-case-for-roberto-alomar/#comment-15641 Devon, In a couple of days, I will do a similar piece on Barry Larkin. One comment here. His numbers are not quite as good as Alomar. Robbie is the #45 position player of the era while Larkin is #84. He also has obvious HOF numbers. Mike<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('15641','Mike Hoban'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('15641','Mike Hoban','Devon,\r\n\r\nIn a couple of days, I will do a similar piece on Barry Larkin. One comment here. His numbers are not quite as good as Alomar. Robbie is the #45 position player of the era while Larkin is #84. He also has obvious HOF numbers.\r\n\r\nMike'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Devon,

In a couple of days, I will do a similar piece on Barry Larkin. One comment here. His numbers are not quite as good as Alomar. Robbie is the #45 position player of the era while Larkin is #84. He also has obvious HOF numbers.

Mike

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Devon Young http://seamheads.com/2009/12/18/the-2010-hof-ballot-%e2%80%93-the-case-for-roberto-alomar/comment-page-1/#comment-15639 Devon Young Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:51:29 +0000 http://seamheads.com/blog/2009/12/18/the-2010-hof-ballot-%e2%80%93-the-case-for-roberto-alomar/#comment-15639 Agreed. Now, where does Larkin fit in? His numbers on the surface look a lot like Alomar's<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('15639','Devon Young'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('15639','Devon Young','Agreed. Now, where does Larkin fit in? His numbers on the surface look a lot like Alomar\'s'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Agreed. Now, where does Larkin fit in? His numbers on the surface look a lot like Alomar’s
Reply – Quote
]]>