Comments on: Touring the Bases With…George Culver http://seamheads.com/2010/01/27/touring-the-bases-with-george-culver/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:40:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mike Lynch http://seamheads.com/2010/01/27/touring-the-bases-with-george-culver/comment-page-1/#comment-16100 Mike Lynch Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:34:24 +0000 http://www.seamheads.com/blog/?p=2034#comment-16100 I don't think Dave meant the mound was physically raised in 1968, I think he meant that it was still higher than it is today.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('16100','Mike Lynch'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('16100','Mike Lynch','I don\'t think Dave meant the mound was physically raised in 1968, I think he meant that it was still higher than it is today.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> I don’t think Dave meant the mound was physically raised in 1968, I think he meant that it was still higher than it is today.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Cliff Blau http://seamheads.com/2010/01/27/touring-the-bases-with-george-culver/comment-page-1/#comment-16099 Cliff Blau Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:06:14 +0000 http://www.seamheads.com/blog/?p=2034#comment-16099 In 1968, the mound was 15 inches high, same as it had been since 1950.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('16099','Cliff Blau'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('16099','Cliff Blau','In 1968, the mound was 15 inches high, same as it had been since 1950.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> In 1968, the mound was 15 inches high, same as it had been since 1950.
Reply – Quote
]]>