Baseball Digest Daily
HomeAbout UsArticlesBlogPlayer TrackerMLB StatsBaseball ProspectusSeamheads

Chipper Jones, MVP Shortstops, and OPS Denial

by James Farris

If Jimmy Rollins had the fifth best OPS on his own team, how can he be the Most Valuable Player of an entire league?

Pete Palmer and John Thorn are given credit for popularizing On-base Plus Slugging (OPS) as a viable statistic for placing value on a hitter. They mentioned the statistic in their 1984 book The Hidden Game of Baseball, and it slowly snowballed, becoming more accepted by the mainstream as it rolled all the way to the back of Topps baseball cards in 2004. There are skeptics who refute the stat as incomplete. They say OBP is much more important to scoring runs than SLG, and the league leader in slugging is inevitably .150 to .200 points higher than the on-base leader. Still, OPS is a flawed, but fairly accurate judge of the most valuable hitter in each league.

Last season in the National League, pundits and writers debated the three-man race for the Most Valuable Player Award. Jimmy Rollins came on and eventually took the award, but Matt Holliday and Prince Fielder still received substantial first place votes. Holliday ended up losing out to Rollins by only 17 points after Fielder slipped and Milwaukee failed to make the playoffs. Rollins’ OPS was considerably lower than Holliday or Fielder, and even as a lead-off hitter on the top scoring offense in the NL, his OBP was well below as well. Understanding defense and intangibles can be taken in account by voters, do they make up enough of the gap in the numbers?

Going strictly by OPS, the MVP should have gone to a hitter a little under last season’s radar. A hitter who didn’t receive any first place votes. A hitter who the voters deemed as the sixth best choice for the MVP—Chipper Jones. Chipper Jones? Yes, when the smoke cleared, Jones’ 1.029 OPS lead the NL, and Rollins’ .875, was well out of the top 10.

Voting OPS OBA SLG Team Wins
Jimmy Rollins 353 .875 .344 .531 89
Matt Holiday 336 1.012 .405 .607 90
Prince Fielder 284 1.013 .395 .618 83
Chipper Jones 107 1.029 .425 .604 84

Rollins, a vocal leader on the best offensive team in the NL, was far from being the team’s OPS leader. Those that argue that he deserves the award because he led the league in at-bats, games, runs, and triples, and he’s the catalyst for the best lineup in the NL, need to note that he was .136 points behind Barry Bonds in OBP, fifth on his own team in OPS, and sixth in OBP. I’m not a mathematician, but I think that there are at least four other Phillies who, put at the top of that lineup, would have had scored more runs than Rollins.

Phillies OPS OBA SLG
Jimmy Rollins .875 .344 .531
Chase Utley .976 .410 .566
Ryan Howard .976 .392 .584
Pat Burrell .902 .400 .502
Aaron Rowand .889 .374 .515

“The best player on the best team“ or “the best hitter in the best lineup” has always received support from MVP voters. One can assume this is something the voters took into account with Rollins (although it seems pretty clear that he wasn’t the best hitter on the Phillies), but there are many other factors that can keep an OPS leader from becoming the MVP. Obviously, a great pitching performance can lead to an MVP (although Dennis Eckersley was the last pitcher in either league to win an MVP in 1992), but well-liked players, large personalities, big markets, gold glove defense, stolen bases, or a hot player who carries a team through a pennant race can all sway voters. Taking these factors into account, and looking back over the last 30 years, it is interesting to see when the OPS leader in a league was well out of the MVP voting; far enough back that none of these factors can be used as an alibi.

The MVP is an important designation on the history of baseball. That player becomes synonymous with that season, linked forever, as chapter and subchapter. It is a coronation; the player is knighted and forever known as “Former MVP.” When Miguel Tejada was traded to the Astros a few weeks ago, headlines read “MVP Shortstop Headed to Houston”, and sportscasters teased “See where this former MVP will now call home.”

Tejada, like Rollins a shortstop, won an MVP in 2002 with an OPS well below the leaders at .862. That same year Jim Thome was in his last season with Cleveland, and finished seventh in the MVP voting while leading the AL with a 1.122 OPS. (Thome’s former teammate, Albert Belle, was the only player to exceed 1.000 in 1998, but he finished eighth in the MVP voting).

The grossest discrepancies between OPS and MVP voting in the past 30 years are those players who finished tenth or below in voting. Some of these players played in shortened seasons whether it be through strike or injury:

Year   Voting OPS OBA SLG MVP OPS OBA SLG
1999 Larry Walker 10th 1.168 .458 .710 Chipper Jones 1.074 .441 .633
1995 Barry Bonds 12th 1.008 .431 .577 Barry Larkin .886 .394 .492
1984 Dwight Evans 11th .920 .388 .532 Willie Hernandez      
1983 George Brett NA .947 .385 .563 Cal Ripken Jr.
.888 .371 .517
1979 Dave Kingman 11th .956 .343 .613 Keith Hernandez .930 .417 .513
            Willie Stargell .904 .352 .552

The strike delayed the start of the 1995 season, and shortened it to 144 games. The first place votes were scattered among five players, but Bonds received none of these. The seven-time MVP was on a last place team, and the MVP went to another shortstop in a high-powered lineup on a playoff team. Barry Larkin’s OPS was way off the leader board, though still .011 points higher than Rollins’ in ‘07. (Mike Piazza did get three first place votes with an OPS only .002 points lower than Bonds).

Brett also led the league in OPS in 1980 and won the MVP, and again in 1985, but finished second in voting to Don Mattingly. In 1983, one can assume legitimately that missing 22 games with a toe injury hurt his chances, but maybe less legitimately, that was the year of the “pine tar incident,” and it may have somewhat tarnished his image. But in 1983, the OPS leader got zero MVP points (Bob Stanley, Rudy Law and George Wright all got votes). Interestingly, it was a shortstop with an OPS in the .880s, on a first place team that finished second in the AL in runs who won the award.

Evans failed to receive an MVP trophy twice while leading the AL in OPS in ’81 and ‘84. Both of these awards went to relief pitchers, Rollie Fingers and Willie Hernandez, respectively, who combined for only 127 games during the two seasons, while Evans played 270 games during those years. Evans’ longtime teammate, Wade Boggs, also never won an MVP award, but did lead the AL in OPS in 1987 and 1988. In 1988, Jose Canseco was a unanimous MVP selection, and Boggs’ teammate, Mike Greenwell, finished second with 242 points. Greenwell has claimed that he should be awarded the MVP after Canseco’s admission of steroid use, but perhaps it should be given instead to Boggs.

Another third baseman who is no stranger to MVP awards is Mike Schmidt. Schmidt was awarded the MVP in 1980, 1981, and 1986, after leading the NL in OPS all three seasons, but he also led in two other years. In 1982, Dale Murphy won the MVP with a .885 OPS, while Schmidt finished sixth in voting with a .950 OPS. In 1984, Ryne Sandberg won with a .887 OPS, while Schmidt finished seventh with a .919 OPS. Both Sandberg and Murphy’s teams made the playoffs in their MVP seasons.

There are other times in the voting when performance measured by OPS has mattered so little to voters, and being on a good team has been so crucial that the OPS leader has been buried behind three players on the same team. In Larry Walker’s aforementioned case, he finished 10th in the voting in 1999 behind three members of the Wild Card champion Mets: Mike Piazza, Robin Ventura, and Edgardo Alfonzo. In 2006, Travis Hafner’s 1.097 OPS led the AL, but he finished eighth in the MVP voting behind three Central Division champion Twins: Justin Morneau, Joe Mauer, and Johan Santana. Frank Thomas’ .975 OPS was high enough to lead the AL, but not high enough for him to receive more votes than Mike Devereaux, who finished seventh, or three members of the World Champion Blue Jays: Joe Carter, Roberto Alomar, and Dave Winfield.

Comments (5) -> “Chipper Jones, MVP Shortstops, and OPS Denial”

  1. Mike Hoban
    28 March 2008 15:24
    1

    James,

    You want to use OPS to award the MVP? Why? Why not a statistic that is much more inclusive - like Win Shares? Wouldn’t that make more sense? Whatever happened to defense?

    The Hardball Times lists these three National Leaguers as the tops in Win Shares in 2007.

    D, Wright 34
    A. Pujols 32
    M. Cabrera 30

    Rollins was #7 with 28 and Chipper was #11 with 26.

    Chipper for MVP? I do not think so.

  2. Brian Joseph
    28 March 2008 19:28
    2

    MVP goes to the Most Valuable Player in the league. Sometimes you have to look beyond the statistics. Down the stretch, J-Roll proved to be the player that sparked the Phils at the end. Aided by the Mets’ cataclysmic collapse, Rollins was the catalyst that got the Phillies to the post-season.

    They were 7 games out on August 25th and just 4 games above .500. The Phils finished 23-11 and Rollins went .335 and reached based in 31 of 34 games. He had 19 extra base hits and stole 16 out of 17 bases. In addition, Rollins was a Gold Glover.

    Also, Rollins was the 4th player ever to get 20 2Bs, 3Bs, HRs and SBs in the same season… and the ONLY player to ever get 30-20-30-40 in those same categories… in the history of the majors.

    It’s hard to be unbiased as a Phils fan but Rollins was a no brainer.

  3. Justin
    29 March 2008 02:35
    3

    I’ve seen pretty convincing arguments made for Utley and Wright, maybe Holliday. There was a good luck at this the other day on THT.

    About your point that Rollins was 5th on PHI in OPS- I don’t think it’s really fair to say that Pat Burrell would have had better stats than Rollins if he’d be leading off. That isn’t what happened. Maybe I would have had better stats if I led off for the Phillies- we’ll never know- but that doesn’t make me an MVP candidate. Howard struck out 200 times, Burrell and Rowand 120 each. Utley played better when he was in the lineup, I think, but that was only for 132 games. Rollins also stole 41 bases, compared to 16 for the other four combined, and that doesn’t show up in OPS, of course.

    When all is said and done, I don’t really agree with the choice of Rollins for MVP, but I guess it depends on how each voter determines that. At any rate I certainly don’t think it was an outrageous choice like some people make it out to be; I would echo Mike Hoban’s comments about finding an appropriate metric for this sort of thing.

  4. Brian Joseph
    29 March 2008 07:56
    4

    There’s no metric for MVP. It would be like watching an extra inning game and a player who had gone 0-5 hitting a game-winning home run and giving star of the game to someone else because a metric told you to.

    Value comes in many shapes and sizes and it is more than just a statistical metric.

  5. Matt Mitchell
    02 April 2008 06:34
    5

    MVP balloting is hardly an infallible process. Take a look at how media commentators tend position their arguments for a player. First, they’ll cite Triple Crown stats, maybe a few others if they understand some of the newer metrics, and then they’ll argue about what they think he intangibly means to his team. Any number, when understood and used properly, will help one’s argument for a player, but is not THE argument.

    And personally, I don’t think enough love was shown to Matt Holliday last year. Forget the fact that he plays at a mile high. He can rake it for any team and plays a good left field for the Rockies in that cavernous outfield.

Reply