Baseball Digest Daily

Was Clemente Really Slighted by MVP Voters in 1960?

by Mike Lynch

Roberto Clemente called the 1960 N.L. MVP voting an “injustice,” but was it really?

The other night I was watching a documentary about Pittsburgh Pirates Hall of Fame outfielder Roberto Clemente, which stated that Clemente was bitter about not being named N.L. MVP after the 1960 season, so much so that he refused to wear his World Series ring (what his ring had to do with the outcome of the MVP Award is beyond me, but I digress). Not only did Clemente feel snubbed by the voters, but he felt the outcome was racially biased, especially in light of the fact that Pirates shortstop Dick Groat, a singles-hitting white shortstop with a decent glove, won the award. Groat, the acknowledged leader of the Pirates, was said to be affable with the press, with whom he enjoyed a friendly relationship. Clemente, who finished eighth in the voting, was said to be misunderstood and moody, and he openly discussed his injuries, leading the writers to label him a hypochondriac.

One of the historians interviewed for the documentary insisted that there was no way there were seven National Leaguers better than Clemente in 1960. I knew Groat had won the award and I remembered that Clemente hit .351 in 1961, but I wasn’t aware of their 1960 numbers, and I was curious to see how many Win Shares each had produced that season. What I found was interesting.

Not only was Clemente not the most valuable player in the National League in 1960 (at least in terms of Win Shares), it can be argued that there were at least five Pirates who were as valuable, if not more so.

Player Team Pos. Win Shares
Dick Groat Pittsburgh SS 25
Don Hoak Pittsburgh 3B 23
Bill Mazeroski Pittsburgh 2B 21
Roberto Clemente Pittsburgh OF 20
Bob Friend Pittsburgh SP 20
Vern Law Pittsburgh SP 20

Now I realize that Win Shares are not the only way to measure value and I also understand that everyone has a different definition of “most valuable.” Some feel the most valuable player is the one who posts the gaudiest numbers, especially in the triple crown categories, regardless of his team’s performance, while others insist that the MVP should be the best player on a winning team. This disparity was no more evident than in 1987 and ‘88. Andre Dawson was named the National League’s MVP in ‘87 after hitting 49 homers and driving in 137 runs for a Cubs team that finished in last place in the N.L. East with a 76-85 record. The very next season, Kirk Gibson copped the award despite hitting only 25 homers and driving in 76 runs because he was widely considered to be the catalyst of a Dodgers team that improved its record by 21 wins over its 1987 total and won the World Series.

But it’s clear that Clemente neither posted gaudy stats—he batted .314 with 16 homers and 94 RBIs and posted an .815 OPS (121 OPS+)—nor was he the best player on his team. According to Win Shares and the baseball writers, that title belonged to Groat.

Sticking with Win Shares for a moment, here is a list of all National Leaguers who earned at least 20 in 1960:

RK Player Team Pos. Win Shares
1. Eddie Mathews Milwaukee 3B 38
  Willie Mays San Francisco OF 38
3. Hank Aaron Milwaukee OF 35
4. Ken Boyer St. Louis 3B 31
5. Ernie Banks Chicago SS 29
6. Orlando Cepeda San Francisco OF/1B 26
7. Joe Adcock Milwaukee 1B 25
  Don Drysdale Los Angeles SP 25
  Dick Groat Pittsburgh SS 25
  Lindy McDaniel St. Louis RP 25
11. Ernie Broglio St. Louis RP 24
  Bill Bruton Milwaukee OF 24
13. Del Crandall Milwaukee C 23
  Don Hoak Pittsburgh 3B 23
  Frank Robinson Cincinnati OF 23
16. Richie Ashburn Chicago OF 22
17. Larry Jackson St. Louis SP 21
  Bill Mazeroski Pittsburgh 2B 21
  Vada Pinson Cincinnati OF 21
20. Roberto Clemente Pittsburgh OF 20
  Bob Friend Pittsburgh SP 20
  Vern Law Pittsburgh SP 20

By this measure, not only were there seven National Leaguers better than Clemente in 1960, but there were 19. Even if the pitchers are removed, there are still 15 players who earned more Win Shares than Clemente in 1960.

Of course nobody knew what a win share was in 1960 and even if they did, there’s no guarantee the voters would have considered them while voting. Eddie Mathews and Willie Mays earned the most Win Shares (38), and both played for teams with winning records, yet Mathews finished 10th in MVP balloting while playing for a second-place team that won 88 games, while Mays finished third while playing for a fifth-place team that won 79 games. Mathews’ teammate, Hank Aaron, finished second in Win Shares, but was 11th in MVP voting.

Clemente finished 20th in Win Shares, but placed eighth in MVP balloting. Clemente’s teammate, Don Hoak, was 13th in Win Shares, but finished second in MVP balloting, and Vern Law, who tied Clemente’s Win Shares total, finished tied for sixth in MVP balloting. So, not only did the writers believe that Groat was more valuable than Clemente, but they also believed three of his teammates were more valuable.

Player Team Pts. Win Shares WS RK
Dick Groat Pittsburgh 276 25 7
Don Hoak Pittsburgh 162 23 13
Willie Mays San Francisco 155 38 1
Ernie Banks Chicago 100 29 5
Lindy McDaniel St. Louis 95 25 7
Ken Boyer St. Louis 80 31 4
Vern Law Pittsburgh 80 20 20
Roberto Clemente Pittsburgh 62 20 20
Ernie Broglio St. Louis 58 24 11
Eddie Mathews Milwaukee 52 38 1

Frankly, had the Pirates not won the World Series, it’s not inconceivable to believe that neither Hoak nor Clemente would have finished in the top 10. Vern Law won the Cy Young Award that year (and maybe he wouldn’t have otherwise), so he probably still would have earned the votes needed for a top-10 finish, and Groat won the batting title and, based on his Win Shares, was certainly good enough to earn votes. But had the Braves finished in first place instead of the Pirates, Mathews, Aaron, Joe Adcock, and Del Crandall (and maybe even Bill Bruton) would have dominated the list instead of the Pittsburgh players (Crandall finished 13th in the voting and Adcock 19th).

It’s also difficult to prove racial bias was at play, considering two of the top four N.L. MVP candidates in 1960 were black, and between 1953 and 1959, black players copped all seven MVP Awards. Until 1960 when Groat won the award, the last white player to win the award in the N.L. was Hank Sauer in 1952. In fact, since Jackie Robinson broke the color line in 1947, nine of the 14 National League MVP Awards handed out between 1947 and 1960 went to black players. That Clemente was also Latino may have worked against him, but Cuban-born White Sox star Minnie Minoso finished fourth in American League MVP voting that same year while playing for a team that finished in third place.

If there was any bias to overcome, it appears that it had more to do with the defensive spectrum than the color of Clemente’s skin or the tone of his accent.

From 1911 to 1960, there were 40 MVP Awards handed out to National Leaguers and 41 to American Leaguers (as usual the leagues followed their own rules, which explains the discrepancy; the N.L. didn’t honor an MVP in 1922 or 1923, but the A.L. did; the N.L. honored an MVP in 1929, but the A.L. didn’t). Of the 81 MVPs, 15 were pitchers and 66 were everyday players. Of those 66 everyday players, 36 played positions located on the left half of the spectrum:

C SS 2B CF 3B RF LF 1B
11 7 10 8 2 6 7 13
36 30
55% 45%

Ten percent isn’t much of a discrepancy, but when team success is considered, the disparity jumps considerably. Forty two of the 66 MVPs played on pennant winners and 65% of them played positions located on the left half of the spectrum.

C SS 2B CF 3B RF LF 1B
7 5 8 7 0 4 3 8
27 15
65% 35%

Twenty two of the MVPs played on World Series winners and the disparity grows even more:

C SS 2B CF 3B RF LF 1B
3 4 2 6 0 2 1 4
15 7
68% 32%

Clemente wasn’t facing racial bias in 1960, he was facing positional bias. Voters clearly regarded strength up the middle more highly than the corner positions, especially on pennant and World Series winning teams. Had he played shortstop for Pittsburgh in 1960, there’s a very good chance he would have won the award over Groat (assuming Clemente could have handled the position). Had he shifted over to center and played there instead of Bill Virdon, it appears he would have had an even better chance to win the award. But he was a right fielder (and a marvelous one at that), playing a position not as respected as most of the others and that seems to have hurt him more than anything else.

Postscript: Clemente finally won an MVP Award in 1966 when he batted .317 with career highs in homers (29) and RBIs (119). Allegedly he felt that the ‘66 award made up for the “injustice” of the 1960 voting. According to Win Shares, he didn’t deserve the award in 1966, either, but the writers acquiesced and he edged Sandy Koufax by 10 points. During the decade of the sixties, seven more black players won the MVP Award in the National League.

Comments (2) -> “Was Clemente Really Slighted by MVP Voters in 1960?”

  1. vinnie
    24 April 2008 13:17
    1

    This points out exactly the problem with him at that time. Clemente wasn’t seen as the dominant hitter he’d become, nor the humanitarian that his untimely death has emerged as his legacy.
    The Bobby Clemente of that day wss perceived as a rather surly, uncommunicative and bitter ball player who’d sit out for imaginary injuries and was less than a team player. These perceptions were believed and thought to be holding him back from reaching the potential that he’d shown brief glimpses of in previous seasons. And he was never thought of as being a franchise player.
    Looing back on his life and his career, we can more accurately judge the body of work but we shouldn’t forget that along the way, there were many bumps in the road and many unpleasant stop overs. Clemente the legend and Clemente the whining slacker are both the same person.

  2. John Lease
    25 April 2008 10:25
    2

    Clemente had a point when it came to the sportswriters. They weren’t exactly impartial, to say the least. Racist? Not to the degree of burning crosses, but yeah, racist. It was a different time back then, that’s for sure.

Reply