<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teams and Star Power</title>
	<atom:link href="https://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?p=241</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 01:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Doom</title>
		<link>https://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?p=241#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Doom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/baseballgauge/blog/?p=241#comment-208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post.
I figured the &#039;14 Braves and &#039;44 Browns would be at/near the top on that last list.  I&#039;m also not surprised to see the Bobby Higginson Tigers on the first list.  Bobby Higginson was a really good player, but when he ends up with the best career of anyone on the team... well... that&#039;s not very good.
I was most surprised by the preponderance of post-expansion teams on the top list.  I guess it makes sense, when you think about it, but it still surprised me.  Anyway, thanks, Dan!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.<br />
I figured the &#8217;14 Braves and &#8217;44 Browns would be at/near the top on that last list.  I&#8217;m also not surprised to see the Bobby Higginson Tigers on the first list.  Bobby Higginson was a really good player, but when he ends up with the best career of anyone on the team&#8230; well&#8230; that&#8217;s not very good.<br />
I was most surprised by the preponderance of post-expansion teams on the top list.  I guess it makes sense, when you think about it, but it still surprised me.  Anyway, thanks, Dan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
