<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brooklyn Dodgers, Jackie Robinson and the 1946 Pennant</title>
	<atom:link href="https://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?p=285</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 01:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bayer</title>
		<link>https://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?p=285#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Bayer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?p=285#comment-338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point Dan .. about there really being 2 champions each season ..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Dan .. about there really being 2 champions each season ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hirsch</title>
		<link>https://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?p=285#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Hirsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 02:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?p=285#comment-327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks.  As for your issue with using 1953 or 1955, I struggle with that as well when picking a better team.  I tend to lean toward the team with the better regular season.  There&#039;s really 2 champions every year.  The winner of the regular season (best record / run differential) and the winner of the tournament (World Series winner). A 7 game series is much too small a sample size to determine the best team. I think 154/162 games is much more telling.  So I&#039;d choose the 1953 team over the 1955 as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  As for your issue with using 1953 or 1955, I struggle with that as well when picking a better team.  I tend to lean toward the team with the better regular season.  There&#8217;s really 2 champions every year.  The winner of the regular season (best record / run differential) and the winner of the tournament (World Series winner). A 7 game series is much too small a sample size to determine the best team. I think 154/162 games is much more telling.  So I&#8217;d choose the 1953 team over the 1955 as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertbayer</title>
		<link>https://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?p=285#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robertbayer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seamheads.com/baseballgauge/blog/?p=285#comment-326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really nice article .. 3 WS Championship for the Cardinals in the 1940s .. yet the Brooklyn Dodgers missed out until 1955 ... I sometimes wonder which team to play in my all time best teams league .. 1953 or 1955 Dodgers .. Even though the 1955 team won the series .. Jackie Robinson was a bench player by that season .. Jackie Robinson, was The Star on the Dodgers who were a team of stars from 1947 to 1953 and beyond ... I cant have a team of the Dodgers being represented without an elite version of Number 42 playing and contributing .. so 1953 it is ..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice article .. 3 WS Championship for the Cardinals in the 1940s .. yet the Brooklyn Dodgers missed out until 1955 &#8230; I sometimes wonder which team to play in my all time best teams league .. 1953 or 1955 Dodgers .. Even though the 1955 team won the series .. Jackie Robinson was a bench player by that season .. Jackie Robinson, was The Star on the Dodgers who were a team of stars from 1947 to 1953 and beyond &#8230; I cant have a team of the Dodgers being represented without an elite version of Number 42 playing and contributing .. so 1953 it is ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
