{"id":11143,"date":"2007-10-01T12:33:21","date_gmt":"2007-10-01T17:33:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.baseball1.com\/notes\/?p=48"},"modified":"2007-10-01T12:33:21","modified_gmt":"2007-10-01T17:33:21","slug":"notes-418-playoff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/2007\/10\/01\/notes-418-playoff\/","title":{"rendered":"Notes #418 — Playoff!"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 NOTES FROM THE SHADOWS OF COOPERSTOWN<\/strong>
\n<\/strong><\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Observations from Outside the Lines<\/strong>
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 By Two Finger Carney (carneya6@adelphia.net)
\n<\/font>#418\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 OCTOBER 1, 2007
\n<\/font><\/strong>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 PLAYOFF!<\/strong>
\n\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 October’s Game<\/em> was once synonymous with the World Series, but over the recent decades, the playoffs<\/em> have produced as much drama, maybe more, than the season’s end games. For newcomers to Notes<\/em>, I prefer the word playoffs<\/em> for all post-season games. It just has a nice ring to it.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Of course, this time around we are also treated to an old-fashioned playoff<\/em>: a one-game, winner-move-on, loser-go-home showdown in Colorado, where the Rockies face the San Diego Padres for the wild card<\/em>. Now, I don’t like that term, which will always smack of football to me. But until baseball expands or contracts or realigns, resulting in an even number of division winners, we are stuck with it.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Yes, once upon a time, playoff<\/em> meant a tie-breaking game or series played to determine which team would play in the Series. At the end of the long 154-game summer, another nine or 27 innings was needed to crown the league champion. Because this was always a rare event, the playoff games were almost always memorable, with Exhibit A, Bobby Thomson’s 1951 HR to give the Giants a win over the Dodgers. Thomson had homered to win Game One of that playoff series; the Dodgers then creamed the Giants, 10-0. And the Brooklynites led the rubber game 4-1 going into the bottom of the ninth. A Giants’ rally knocked out starter Don Newcombe, and Charlie Dressen brought in the fellow who started Game One and yielded that HR to Thomson. Ralph Branca promptly did it again, becoming all-time famous in the process.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The first playoff I recall was 1959, the transplanted Dodgers winning this time over Milwaukee in two straight one-run games. Braves’ ace Warren Spahn pitched just one-third of an inning in relief. Sandy Koufax did the same, but Sandy was still a few years away from acedom. My point is that the playoffs can hinge on how the rotation ends up as the season concludes.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 If you enjoy reading about playoffs<\/em>, I recommend again the excellent book by Jerry Lansche, The Forgotten Championships<\/em> (McFarland, 1989).
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 If I was a Mets fan, I might have titled this issue Collapse<\/em>. How fitting that the team that chased and caught and finally passed the Mets at the end was Philadelphia. Will this erase 1964 for Phillies fans?\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Probably not — and I say that because Pirate fans still feel bad about their team running out of gas in September 1938<\/em>. Before my time, but I still feel it!
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 I find it easy to root for the 2007 Phils, but I’m pulling for the Cubs. 1908, that’s why. I’d like to see them in the Series against Cleveland.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Also for newcomers — I hate five-game playoff series<\/em>. Best of seven seems to fit baseball, but not best of five. Yes, I know that teams down three games to one hardly ever come back to win, but it does happen. And the Red Sox came back from 0-3 just a few years ago. It has always felt wrong to me when a very good team is eliminated in that first round, especially in a Game Five.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Anyway, the 2007 regular season is over, but for one game. It was another one of those years<\/em> for Pirate fans, another sub-.500 finish, despite a good core of young talent. Wait’ll next year.<\/em> At various times, I thought the missing ingredient was a real closer. And it was. But they also lacked a stopper<\/em>, and that might be even more important. The stopper is the starting pitcher (he doesn’t need to be an ace) who rises to the occasion and snaps losing streaks, before they gain momentum. The Pirates had several long losing streaks in 2007 and it ruined the summer. I have no stats to back up this theory, but it seems that twelve or thirteen wins a year by a stopper<\/em>, is worth 17-18 by an ace.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Surely one highlight of the summer was Barry Bonds passing Hank Aaron as the game’s most prolific HR hitter. The event became a kind of litmus test for fans, on what we seem to be calling “the steroid era” (as if it is over, as if we knew when it really began). We are a country that has not come to grips with substance abuse, and the arguments about Bonds reflected that, while revealing a lot of righteousness along the way. As if writers and broadcasters and talk show hosts could all pass drug screening tests regularly.<\/em> Even before the season, I was upset when Bud Selig and MLB failed to react to the poor HOF vote showing for Mark McGuire. How dare they be silent<\/em>, after standing beside McGuire and Sosa in 1998?\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 As if they didn’t know.<\/em> So the hoopla about Bonds was not surprising, only disappointing. He worked damn hard to achieve that record. We know today that he likely was taking a foolish risk with his health and maybe with his life, but we do not know much else with certainty. I stand with Hank Aaron in congratulating Bonds and giving him<\/em> credit.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 A long introduction to this issue. More digging into baseball’s past, which is always a refreshing place to visit, even when it seems too much like the present.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

NOT TRYING IN 1920 STRETCH RUN?\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 <\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Re-reading a lot of “post-scandal” press coverage from 1920 and 1921, I have seen a number of references to how the White Sox were “really not trying” to win the pennant in 1920. Eddie Collins was especially bitter about that — he was clearly hooked on those big bonus checks in October. Red Faber, too, thought that the gamblers were being the Sox’ indifferent play down the stretch.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 I have two problems with this kind of talk. First, there is an assumption that the fixers were in control all thru 1920, and they wanted Cleveland to win. So they pressured the Sox to ease off and bet big on Cleveland. But in fact, the fixers were never in control, and the Sox double-crossed them during the World Series of 1919, as late<\/em> as Game Three.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The other problem is this: the Sox were streaking at the end of the 1920 season, not laying down. You can look it up. After going 8-7 the first half of September, the Sox caught fire, winning 10 of 11 to close within a half game of Cleveland. The only loss in that stretch was in Cleveland, where the Sox took two of three. The loss was a tough, 2-0 game, and Red Faber was the losing pitcher. Kerr and Williams won their games, Lefty by a 5-1 score over Coveleski, Kerr by 10-3 over Bagby.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 In other words, the Sox had gone 18-8 in September — ten games over .500 (five games over in a month produces a pennant contender; 6 x 5 = 30 games over, or a 92-62 record. In 1920, the Sox finished with 96 wins.) Laying down?<\/em> Methinx not.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 What the “clean Sox” who later complained may have been upset about, is the timing<\/em> of Cicotte and Jackson going to the grand jury. The GJ had said that no players would be subpoenaed to testify if it would disrupt the pennant races. The Sox were off on September 28, 29 and 30 (a break in the schedule for making up rainouts, I believe). They were scheduled to finish up with three games with the St Louis Browns, October 1-3. So when Eddie Cicotte decided to spend the first part of his mini-vacation by visiting the downtown courthouse, after a stop to chat with Commy and the Sox’ lawyer Austrian, that<\/em> was very upsetting.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Cicotte’s conscience was bothering him, his name was in the news. He just wanted to get it over with. Last issue, I noted how he might have even entertained the notion that by helping out the grand jury — by confirming that a bunch of the Sox did<\/em> make a deal with gamblers last October — he might have been a hero. Well, that may be a stretch. But he just might<\/em> have hoped that his grand jury testimony would remain confidential — like it was supposed to. That the season would proceed uninterrupted by any indictments. The Sox would beat the Browns and win the AL pennant. Then they would take the World Series from Brooklyn, and no one would doubt that this was a winning<\/em> team. The rumors of a 1919 October fix would finally be buried, in a sea of good feeling about the 1920 Chicago World Champs. Commy back on top, Ban Johnson foiled and on his way out. And with Judge Landis in<\/em>, there would be no more talk of fixed games, baseball’s image would be cleaner than ever.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Instead, the grand jury leaks (inaccurately reported and quickly labeled confessions<\/em>, as if Cicotte and Jackson were speaking for their team, and perhaps for all the crookedness that had infected baseball over the past decade or two) forced the indictments of the players whose names had been “bunched together” in the fix rumors since before the 1919 Series started. That forced Comiskey to suspend the seven still on his roster, beating Ban Johnson to the punch. The crippled Sox team that remained played out the last three games with the Browns, losing 8-6, winning 10-7, then dropping the finale, 16-7. They finished 96-58, two games behind Cleveland. Let me point out the obvious: if Red Faber had won that game against Cleveland on September 24, both teams would have had identical 97-57 records.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The Sox pitching down the stretch in 1920 had been sizzling. Faber, Kerr, Cicotte and Williams all finished with 20+ wins. And even without the heart of the batting order (Jackson, Felsch, Weaver) the Sox averaged over 7 runs in the final series. The problem at the end was the pitching, which gave up over 30 runs in those three games. But Faber and Kerr couldn’t blame Cicotte or Williams for that collapse, only for their voluntary and — courageous? — grand jury appearances before a body dedicated to cleaning up baseball.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 As most B-Sox fans know, the owners sympathetic to Comiskey (Boston’s Frazee and the NY owners) offered to let the Sox “borrow” some players for those final three games. But that was, I’m sure, simply a gesture. Ban Johnson would never let it happen. Not only did he have a running feud going with Commy, but he had some stock in Cleveland (which Commy liked to point out. He thought that was one reason Johnson had helped the grand jury focus on baseball, then on the mess left over from 1919). But it is still fun to imagine the Sox winning the 1920 AL flag on a flurry of long HRs by Babe Ruth, as Carl Mays, Sam Jones and Herb Pennock throw back-to-back-to-back shutouts against the Brown. Then repeat the spectacle against Brooklyn in October’s limelight. Sorry if this upsets my readers in Cleveland — I’m just imagining here.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 I don’t know if the 1920 season was tainted by gamblers. It probably was, but perhaps not any more than most every season before. And maybe less, because the stink from October 1919 caused Ban Johnson to double his efforts to curb ballpark gambling, hiring detectives and instructing his umpires to report anything suspicious. Of course there were suspicious plays and games in 1920 season — like every other season before and after. I have even seen reports that some players “confessed” to laying down in 1920. But the record suggests just the opposite, in the case of the White Sox. They were peaking, not streaking. And as I said before — you can look it up.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

MORE CLUES\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 <\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 John Thorn recently offered me a look at his collection of B-Sox articles, and I eagerly accepted. I always hold my breath when I get new material — will I find something that really should have been in Burying the Black Sox<\/em>? Or something that will contradict something that did<\/em> get in the book? Here’s what I gleaned from the batch John shared, which was considerable.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Letters from Ban.<\/strong> I’m not sure if these were in the Cooperstown collection or not — two letters from Ban Johnson to Joe Gedeon. In 1919, Gedeon was a promising 26-year-old infielder with the St Louis Browns, who knew Swede and McMullin (I think) from his growing-up-in-California youth. He hung out with the Sox in October 1919, but his role is not at all clear. He may have been a somewhat naive bystander, who just placed some bets (but knew that the Sox had made some deals). Or he may have been a go-between, introducing the players to some St Louis gamblers. In any case, as things came undone, Joe Gedeon became Ban Johnson’s ace in the hole — someone who could confirm that the fix was in<\/em>. Johnson was careful to “hide” Gedeon, so he could not be bought off and swayed from testifying at the trial. Gedeon was suspended with the B-Sox after the 1920 season — the ninth man out, really, because Hal Chase was indicted, but not banned. Yes, Joe Gedeon was banished, by Landis — I think Johnson would have been OK with a suspension or fine, but it was Gedeon’s misfortune to be a friend of Ban<\/em> when Judge Landis was staking claim to the throne that Johnson had vacated.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 On May 13, 1921, Johnson writes to Gedeon, who is living at a hotel in Cleveland. He has sent Johnson a report, and gets thanked. He also thanks Gedeon for his positive evaluation of a new AL umpire. Johnson states that Ty Cobb has complained that the NY team is using “rosin” on their bats, and he asks Gedeon to watch for that when the Yankees visit Cleveland. Johnson says he’ll be issuing a ban on this substance (rosin) soon, and then he instructs Gedeon to stay in Cleveland till further notice.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 On June 10, 1921, Johnson writes to Gedeon again, this time at an address of 3210 East 121st Street in Cleveland. Gedeon is thanked for his report on the recent Tris Speaker protest. Again he tells Gedeon to stay put, and ends: “I am glad to know Barrow is doing such thorough work in the matter of handling the gambling situation at the Polo Grounds.”
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Nothing too remarkable, but it is clear that Joe Gedeon is acting as Ban Johnson’s eyes and ears in Cleveland, and perhaps elsewhere as assigned. He is unable to play baseball, but Ban has apparently pledged to keep him working, for the AL. The comment about rosin is interesting — in 1925-26, Ban Johnson would do battle over rosin with Judge Landis — and lose. Johnson thought it could create a new “trick pitch.” Johnson also had no patience when Landis “micromanaged,” getting into the details of the game. Also note the post-scandal reference to a continuing gambling problem (the AL Yankees played at the Polo Grounds in 1921).
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Judge McDonald on the Stand.<\/strong> An article from the (NY?) World<\/em>, July 26, 1921, is a snapshot from the B-Sox trial. The fellow who presided over the 1920 grand jury, Judge McDonald, has taken the stand. Jackson, Cicotte and Williams had repudiated their 1920 statements, and claimed that they were promised — well, if not immunity, then something<\/em>, by McDonald. But the Judge flatly denied making any deal. He recalled having some sympathy for Lefty, who was making a woefully puny salary for a twenty-game winner. The “confessions” were a key in the B-Sox trial. Judge Hugo Friend admitted them only conditionally — the names of anyone except the person making the statement, were omitted. Only after both sides made those “corrections” would they be admitted.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The three players had said that when they signed the papers that waived their immunity, they didn’t know that “they were loaded.” Jackson added that he<\/em> was a bit loaded (drunk), too.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The World<\/em> report said that the three confessions suggested that the fix had been called off after Game Two, although both Jackson and Williams had testified getting paid after Game Four. The State was claiming that the conspiracy did not end until after the last game was played. McDonald on Cicotte:
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

“He told me that he started the first game,” the Judge said, “with the intention of walking the first man. Instead, he hit him with a pitched ball. After that he said his conscience hit him and he realized that he was doing wrong. He regretted his action but did not return the money.”
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 McDonald recalled Jackson telling him that he had arranged with the fixers “to get his $5,000 after each game.” (I don’t believe that is what he told the grand jury.)
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Cicotte then testified that he had been brought to lawyer Austrian’s office [Sept 28, 1920] by Harry Grabiner<\/em>. There, Eddie was introduced to Hartley Replogle, the Asst DA. They told Eddie if he “came through” and told everything, he’d be spared prison and not even get a fine. Then they took Eddie to McDonald. The Judge, Eddie recalled, said Eddie had not told all (they wanted gamblers’ names), Eddie insisted that his statement was full and complete. “Go ahead and indict him,” McDonald told Replogle. Eddie protested, saying Austrian and Replogle had told him that he would not<\/em> be indicted. “Are you trying to bull me?” McDonald asked. Cicotte: “No, I’m telling you the truth.”
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Then Replogle escorted Cicotte to the grand jury. On the way, Austrian reassured him that the promises made to Eddie would be kept. “You can depend on us. We will take care of you. Everything goes as we say.”
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 To many of us looking back, Alfred Austrian comes off as a kind of villain, for not protecting the ballplayers, but instead, directing them to waive their immunity, getting nothing in exchange. Except, perhaps, vague promises. Nothing in writing. At stake was a million-dollar franchise — that’s<\/em> what Austrian was protecting, methinx. In 1920, Judge McDonald was still in the running for the Savior of Baseball<\/em> title, which just might leap-frog him over Landis into baseball’s throne. The players were, I think, mostly trying to stay out of jail, and to cooperate as best they could with the grand jury’s pursuit of the fixers. It was a tough situation: a volcano was erupting, after rumbling and smoking for a year. No one knew what damage it would do.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Two articles on “Risbergate” had some details I hadn’t seen before. <\/strong>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0An article from an unnamed paper dated January 2, 1927, announced that Swede Risberg had informed Judge Landis (who had his hands full at the time with Cobb-Speakergate) that the White Sox “bought” four games from Detroit in early September 1917 to help the Sox clinch the pennant; the Sox returned the favor in 1919 to help Detroit finish in the money (they ended up a half game out of third place). These events were not the work of just eight crooked players, it was a true team effort — Eddie Collins and Ray Schalk participated. In the thing was instigated by Sox manager Pants Rowland.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The AP account has Risberg making the charges on New Years Day — this was before Americans had TV and Bowl games. And Buck Weaver was standing by, nodding assent as Swede went on, “although he declined to talk.” Buck would later choose to side with the majority in denouncing Risberg; only Gandil supported him. Schalk was going to manage the Sox in 1927. Former Detroit SS Donie Bush would be managing in Pittsburgh. So the charges would have lots of repercussions, if they proved to be true.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 “I’m not squawking to get even with anybody,” Risberg said. “I’m not sore at any ball players. I heard that the bosses of baseball wanted to clean up the game and I told my piece to help them. Every word of what I told Landis is the truth and I’ll face any of the fellows I accused. That goes for Rowland.” (Pants had already called Swede a liar.) “They pushed Ty Cobb and Tris Speaker out on a piker bet. I think it’s only fair that the ‘white lillies’ get the same treatment.”
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Swede had to get back to his Minnesota dairy farm, but he promised to return for the hearing Landis was convening. “I tried to get reinstated in baseball once, but it is too late now. I’m muscle-bound and too old, but I have a little boy and I’m willing to help all I can in cleaning up baseball for the sake of the game when he is old enough to play.”
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 When Risberg complained to Landis that he received no reply to his request for reinstatement, Landis
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

reached into his file and brought forth a letter, undelivered because Risberg had moved from Chicago without leaving a forwarding address, which invited Risberg to “come in and talk things over.” The resentment faded in Risberg’s face when he saw this letter that never reached him.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Risberg gave the account that is now familiar to us. But this AP story has Landis asking Risberg if he had heard the alternate version — that the pool of money was raised as a reward, not a bribe. “When I first came into baseball, that was the version I heard of the story you are telling us now.” The Judge did not add that he had also investigated the story, soon after taking office in January 1921. Risberg said he never heard of a team bribing a third team to play harder.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Swede said that he had met Pants Rowland right after the B-Sox scandal broke in 1920, and Rowland told him, “For heaven’s sake, don’t mention that 1917 series.” Swede also ran into Hooks Dauss and Donie Bush about that time, and Bush said, “Well, I guess the 1917 stuff will be popping soon.”
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The Swede refused to discuss the 1919 Series, but he insisted that “I took no bribe and I did not lay down in that series. I was not guilty.”\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Asked about Cobb and Speaker, Swede said that they were “baseball idols” and were innocent of any wrongdoing. “They are the greatest ballplayers the game ever saw.” Swede also told Landis that he thought that he was entitled to the second-place money from the 1920 season.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The other Risbergate article<\/strong> is from the NY Telegram<\/em>, and is dated January 7, 1927. Swede has stuck to his story, while 26 men “gave him the lie” with the highlight coming, perhaps, when one of the 26 called Swede a pig. Gandil will talk tomorrow.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The hearing went four hours, and several players used the “d” word — “damn” — that’s how hot things got. Donie Bush challenged Swede to a fight. Buck Weaver said he didn’t contribute the $45 that the others put up, and didn’t play in the shady games. “I was always in there to win.” Buck was, of course, clearly lobbying Landis for reinstatement. Thirteen former Sox admitted that they did<\/em> kick in $45 — but it was to reward, not to bribe. Red Faber wrote a check.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The alabi was not perfect. One of the Detroit pitchers (Bernie Boland) said he got $50 — but he didn’t pitch against Boston (for the reward); he did pitch in the tainted series. “I guess it was a present for my rooting on the bench.”\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 On the other hand, Hook Dauss said he got $180 from the pool, and he didn’t pitch in the tainted games. (Was he bribed not<\/em> to?)
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 “There was much verbiage” at the hearing, but just one piece of evidence. “Exhibit A” was a check written by Eddie Collins. It was dated after the “sloughed” series. Collins said he didn’t approve of the pool, but went along with his teammates.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 In support of Risberg was another fact: the Sox stole 21 bases in the four-game sweep of Detroit. Oscar Stanage, the Tiger catcher, sheepishly admitted that was “not unusual.” There must have been much straining to keep straight faces at that point.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Ty Cobb did some battle with Judge Landis. Cobb denied that he ever played in a crooked game. The Commish asked Cobb if he ever heard any discussion about the “sloughing” rumors. “I already answered that.” When Landis pressed Cobb about some interviews he was purported to have given, Cobb shot back, “If you had been watching the papers as closely for the denial as you were for the original stories, you would know that I denied ever making such statements.”\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Cobb smiled at Landis as he lef the stand. The Judge “failed to smile back.” (It’s too bad that this scene wasn’t in the Tommy Lee Jones film.)
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Buck Weaver asked Landis directly for reinstatement, as he<\/em> left the stand. This raised the possibility of a new investigation of the 1919 fix. But Landis would have none of that. “Drop me a line about that, Buck, and I’ll take the matter up.” Buck was still writing to the Commish in the 1950s.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

THE CATBIRD SEAT\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 <\/u><\/em><\/strong>
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 I recently had the chance to meet Dave Frishberg and see him perform, in Cooperstown, the perfect setting for Van Lingle Mungo<\/em> and some of his more nostalgic offerings. Dave is easy enough to google, if you’re interested in this jazz man — singer, pianist, lyricist, and — baseball fan.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Dave has written some songs on — of all things — the “Black Sox scandal.” In his story, a contemporary fan (and his girl friend) travel back in time to see if they can un-fix the Fix. The Catbird Seat<\/em> remains unfinished, but I hope it gets completed someday — we need a good B-Sox comedy. The script may be on hold, but Dave performs a number of songs from Catbird Seat<\/em>, including the title song (sung by the dapper, dancing Hal Chase in the bustling lobby of “Cinci-frickin-nati’s” Sinton Hotel, before the tainted Series begins. (I’m not sure Chase was there, but he probably sang and danced better than Abe Attell.)
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 There’s also a tribute to Matty<\/em>, who registers at the Sinton (but not to his roommate, would-be whistleblower Hugh Fullerton). And then there’s The Wife And The Kid<\/em>, sung by Eddie Cicotte, who is having second thoughts about the Fix on the eve of the game. I think this is a marvelous song because hardly anyone knows that Eddie Cicotte said — consistently — that after he hit the first batter in Game One, his conscience kicked in, and he pitched the rest of the Series to win. The song catches his probably ambivalence about things — he’s taken the $10,000 (Hal Chase reminds him that that has certain implications), thinking mainly of “the missus and the kiddies” and how 10 G will help secure his family’s future. But can he — will he — go through with it?
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 When I played around with a screenplay based on my research for Burying the Black Sox<\/em>, I thought it could focus on “The Day That Shook Baseball” — September 28, 1920, when Cicotte and Jackson told the grand jury that the fix was in<\/em>. Watching Dave Frishberg on the 87th anniversary of that fateful day was almost spooky. Maybe someday we can collaborate and mesh our stories together. I think if I was going to try to un-do the Fix, I’d take a couple books back in time with me, and show the players how they went down in history. I am sure that they believed the risk of being punished for the deed was low — and the odds of ending up with reputations as Benedict Arnolds, or Judas Iscariots, totally ridiculous. Lighten up, man from the future, it’s just a little side bet, no big deal, everybody’s doing it.<\/em>
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

DON’T FORGET TO VOTE\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 <\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Option A: Thank Marc Ecko for buying Barry’s 756th HR ball, but only after he passes a drug screening.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Option B: Brand Marc Ecko for defacing it.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Option C: Launch Marc Ecko into space forever.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Collectibles is one aspect of baseball that has never really appealed to me, so you can imagine my reaction when someone spent $752,467 at an auction to purchase a baseball. Maybe it’s partly because I visit Cooperstown so often, but historic bats and balls do not give me a tingle. Not even the Doubleday Baseball, when I thought it was Abner’s.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Here’s my problem with Marc Ecko. He has made national headlines with his purchase, and that’s OK, but if I spent that much on a baseball, I wouldn’t want my wife and family to know it, let alone the world. What irks me is that he has imposed his opinion about Barry Bonds on a historic artifact. It has taken Bonds a career to achieve the milestone of 756. Ecko probably has no idea of the work that was involved. Whatever Bonds took, was to enable him to work out longer and harder, so he could be a better competitor on the diamond. I have to believe his team, his trainer and manager and owner, as well as the baseball authorities, knew pretty much what was going on with Barry Bonds and many others. When they finally acted, they may have done so for the wrong reason — not because the steroids, etc, were harming (maybe killing) these guys, but because of public pressure. Didn’t look good.<\/em>
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Let’s see what Cooperstown does with the ball. If it was up to me, I’d display it alongside all the other famous spheres, with the asterisk out of sight<\/em>.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The asterisk, by the way, reveals a certain ignorance of baseball history. It really stands for “prejudice” — against Roger Maris in 1961 (how dare he pass Babe Ruth!<\/em>) and now against Barry Bonds. If I was captioning the ball, I’d point that out. Hank Aaron faced a tremendous amount of prejudice on his way to 755, especially as he approached Ruth’s 714. So if the Hall displays the branded asterisk, let them note that it shows how prejudice is alive and well in 2007.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 I am hardly the first to point out that there never was an asterisk in 1961<\/em> — so Ecko’s will be the first. I resent anyone buying their way into Cooperstown. I would have so much more respect for Marc Ecko if he donated the ball anonymously, without defacing it with his ego. Shame on him.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

FORBES FIELD — THE BOOK\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 <\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Forbes Field<\/em>, edited by David Cicotello and Angelo Louisa, is a book that is — like the old ballpark itself — something to be savored<\/em>. I first visited Forbes fifty years ago, when I was eleven. Built in 1909, in a record (still standing?) four months, Forbes would live to be 61 before yielding to Three Rivers<\/em> in 1970. In those six decades, it was a place where — as I once put it — Pirate fans felt more at home — than when they were at home.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 I think my grandfather attended the first game at Forbes, because my family had a stickpin from that occasion, with the date struck on a tiny catcher’s mitt holding a baseball. (I donated the pin to the Hall of Fame after my father died in 1972, in his name.) And I think the ballpark always felt like a family thing, full of memories. The older you were, the more memories you probably had. (When Three Rivers passed the torch to the Pirates current park, I regretted most the lost memories. I had attended my only World Series game there, with my father, less than a year before he passed away.)
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Forbes Field<\/em> has everything you would want in a book about an old favorite ballpark. Essays on how it was built, the great teams and individuals who played there. And not just the Pirates, but the Pittsburgh Negro Leaguers and footballers, too. One of the most enjoyable sections of the book was a transcript of the radio broadcast of the final game at Forbes. The words are not to be read, but to be listened to<\/em>, and you can actually hear Bob Prince and Nellie King coming out of the radio tuned to KDKA.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 The book also contains a ton of memories — from players and fans, ushers and vendors. It’s like a giant bonus issue of the Pirate alumni publication The Black and Gold<\/em>, with an emphasis on the gold. And then there are the photographs, all through the book. They are worthy of a family album.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Obviously, this book will appeal strongly to those who have their own memories of Forbes, the Old Lady of Schenley Park. And to Pirate fans (I’d probably read a book on the predecssors to Forbes, Exhibition Park or Recreation Park, but with less interest.) But I recommend it to younger fans, too, just as I recommend that they listen to the stories told by grandparents. The stories of Forbes are rich and worth re-telling.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

THE OBENSHAIN-ON-LANDIS SERIES\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 <\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 At the end of Notes #416<\/em>, I mentioned a series of five articles that Collyer’s Eye<\/em> ran, starting October 8, 1932. They were written by the late Earl Obenshain, who had once been the “confidential secretary” to Ban Johnson. So we can expect the series to have an anti-Landis, pro-Johnson bias. I was going to summarize them in #417<\/em>, but ran out of space, so here goes:
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Landis’ Introduction to Baseball Czardom.<\/strong> Obenshain says he wants to present how Landis dealt with events, in order to judge how he “measured up to expectations” — when you give someone absolute authority, expectations are high. He was to be nothing less than “the savior of baseball.” Obenshain notes that baseball itself had wide appeal, making it democratic; but it had chosen to consolidate power in a single Commissioner, and he compares the post to that of the infallible popes of Rome. Landis was<\/em> the law. “He was asked to save the magnates from themselves” when baseball was in crisis. How has he done?
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Landis has been inconsistent — but Obenshain notes that this should nor have been a surprise, it set him apart as a judge, from those who only followed a set formula. Ban Johnson had complained that Landis refused to help bring the “Black Sox” case to trial. But Landis acted swiftly to ban the players when they were found “not guilty” and cheered in court. Obenshain seems to like that result, and perhaps it would have been better if baseball had been spared “the turmoil of prosecution and washing of dirty linen” — and he recalls that when Landis took over, the owners had agreed not<\/em> to go to court. Obenshain stops short of suggesting Ban Johnson forced the B-Sox trial to embarrass Comiskey, but he gives this round to Landis.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 In the O’Connell-Dolan case, Landis made goats of the two players and “took no action at all” (none that was disclosed) against any other Giants. He rates Landis tactless, and guesses that Landis was basically trying to avoid a bigger black eye, especially if a full investigation wrecked the Giants and caused the World Series to be called off. The public denounced his ruling as unfair, then promptly bought up Series tickets. Obenshain says Landis did the same with the charges against Cobb and Speaker. “There was evidence in the case that no alibis could explain away.”
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Landis; Judicial Pyrotechnics Earned Much Scorn of Colleagues and Much Publicity<\/strong>. This October 15 headline is a mouthful. Obenshain recalls Landis’ role in the Federal League lawsuit. He refused to rule at all, telling the sportsmen to settle their troubles and then go out and play ball. If they didn’t he just might hold all their contracts to be “unlegal” and all of the magnates to be guilty of “offenses against the liberties guaranteed any American citizen.” (I may be reading into this, but it sounds like Landis suspected that the reserve clause, binding players like slaves to one team for life, was at odds with the way freedom worked in the US of A.) Landis then said he also thought baseball “restrictions and regulations” were essential to the orderly conduct of the game. In the Federal League case, “baseball and Landis became acquainted. Their companionship would develop later.” Obenshain ends the essay by wondering how Landis ever got on, and stayed on, the federal bench. “He often seemed to look on the whole thing as a joke.”
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 While Parading Eccentricities Before Public Landis Keeps Eye on Pocketbook.<\/strong> October 22, another great headline. Most of this installment is a biography of Landis, with the familiar stories. His decisions made headlines but were usually overturned on appeal to higher courts. The public seemed to like the way his punishments fit the crimes. In 1932, Landis was making $65,000 a year. He enjoys travel, and may believe himself to be a good “ad” for baseball. Obenshain sees Landis as having a close eye on the business end of the game.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Baseball Magnates, Fearful of Unsavory Record, Submit to Landos ‘Iron’ Contract<\/strong>. October 29, and Obenshain returns to the story of how Landis came to ascend the baseball throne. He recalls that the crown was first offered to ex-president Taft, who just said no. Landis was selected because baseball needed “a publicity man.” The circumstances (thanks to the scandal) gave Landis the leverage to dictate his terms. The magnates would yield all their rights — “even their right to think.”\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Obenshain thinks the owners, when they hired Landis, “cleverly conveyed” to him the idea than Ban Johnson’s wings needed to be clipped.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Landis, Forced Out of U.S. Court Job, Devotes Full Time to Baseball Czardom.<\/strong> November 5, the series’ last installment. Obenshain recalled that the minor leagues also endorsed Landis, but obtained a revision of a section regarding the draft. His original contract ran for seven years. At first, not sure of whether he could deal with the magnates on a regular basis, Landis remained a federal judge. When this was questioned in Congress, he resigned from the bench. Obenshain then recalls a story that suggested there was an “underlying purpose” in getting Landis off the bench, which may or may not be true. The story went like this — some “malefactors of great wealth” were headed to court — Landis’ — and engineered his removal.
\n<\/font>\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0<\/font><\/p>\n

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 And that ends the Obenshain series. Nothing too exciting or surprising. I think Obenshain admired Landis for being an original thinker, not tied to rules and precedents. He could be exasperating, but he also kept things interesting.
\n<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 NOTES FROM THE SHADOWS OF COOPERSTOWN \u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 Observations from Outside the Lines \u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 By Two Finger Carney (carneya6@adelphia.net) #418\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 OCTOBER 1, 2007 \u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 PLAYOFF! \u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0\u00c3\u201a\u00c2\u00a0 October’s Game was once synonymous with the World Series, but over the recent decades, the playoffs have produced as much drama, maybe more, than the season’s end games. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11143","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11143"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11143\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}