{"id":11360,"date":"1999-08-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-08-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-02-02T21:57:57","modified_gmt":"2011-02-02T21:53:18","slug":"11360","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/1999\/08\/01\/11360\/","title":{"rendered":"NOTES #195"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t <P ALIGN=\"center\"><B><FONT SIZE=\"4\">WHEN DAVID BECAME GOLIATH<\/FONT><FONT\n\t\tSIZE=\"3\"><\/FONT><\/B><FONT SIZE=\"3\"> <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>One of the things about baseball that endears it to writers is that the<br \/>\n\t\tevent can be missed, but written about almost endlessly. I never saw Babe<br \/>\n\t\tRuth&#8217;s &#8220;called shot,&#8221; yet I can plan to write a whole book on the topic (it<br \/>\n\t\twould include four pages of this issue of <I>Notes<\/I>.) <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>I missed David Cone&#8217;s perfect game on July 18th, too, but does that mean<br \/>\n\t\tI cannot headline the event here? Of course not. I missed Ted Williams at the<br \/>\n\t\tFenway Midsummer Classic, and I missed some late-inning Blue Sox excitement<br \/>\n\t\twhen I left early, and those misses are fuel for this issue, too. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>But back to David Cone. I first learned of his perfecto driving home<br \/>\n\t\tafter my second heat-dodging, air-conditioned movie at a mall that weekend<br \/>\n\t\t(<I>Star Wars<\/I>), on a car radio newscast. No details, just the bare bones:<br \/>\n\t\t27 up, 27 down for Conie. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>If I was a Yankee fan, my VCR would have recorded the event, and upon my<br \/>\n\t\tarrival home, I would have basked in the delicious monotony of those nine<br \/>\n\t\tstraight one-two-threes. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>If I was a Mets fan, I likely would have groaned &#8212; one more no-no by an<br \/>\n\t\tex-Met. Surely Seaver and Gooden and Cone had terrific seasons with the Mets,<br \/>\n\t\tthe Mets who let <I>Nolan Ryan<\/I> get away! <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>If I was an Expos fan, I might curse Interleague Plague a little. (I was<br \/>\n\t\twondering how many of the Expos had faced David Cone before. I think I can look<br \/>\n\t\tthat up.) <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>But for this event, I was merely a baseball fan, and so I tip my cap to<br \/>\n\t\tDavid Cone. There is no such animal as an easy perfect game, the odds are<br \/>\n\t\t<I>always<\/I> astronomical. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>When I later learned that it was Yogi Day at the Stadium, and that Don<br \/>\n\t\tLarsen was on hand for the occasion, the phenomenon became even more<br \/>\n\t\tphenomenal. To be &#8220;pitcher perfect&#8221; with echoes of 1956 in the air &#8212; this is<br \/>\n\t\tjust one more time when baseball writes a script that Hollywood would have to<br \/>\n\t\treject as too unreal. It is more Twilight Zone than actual occurrence. It is<br \/>\n\t\tthe stuff of sandlot daydreams, of fiction and of fancy. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Except, of course, that it happened. For this one game, this David<br \/>\n\t\tbecame Goliath, an unyielding giant smiting all batters in his path,<br \/>\n\t\tsling-shotting his way to glory. Amen. <B> <\/B><\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B><U>&#8220;PAST GEHRIG, CLOSING IN ON RUTH; SETS SIGHT ON COBB&#8221; <\/U><\/B><br \/>\n\t\t<\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Who would not want to be the person behind the headline above? Well, it<br \/>\n\t\thappens to fit many baby-boomers, who have now lived longer than the Iron Horse<br \/>\n\t\t(who died just shy of 38), and are now chasing the Babe. I personally hope to<br \/>\n\t\tcatch Mr Ruth next November 16, and then begin my dogged pursuit of Ty Cobb.<br \/>\n\t\tThe Georgia Peach reached 74 years, 7 months. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>I&#8217;m not sure why turning 53 myself last May 6 (the same day Willie Mays<br \/>\n\t\tturned 68), reminded me that I was in Ruth&#8217;s vicinity. For a while, I thought<br \/>\n\t\tI&#8217;d passed him &#8212; I can never remember if he was born in 1895 or &#8217;96. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>But I always remember that he died in August of 1948, and that is<br \/>\n\t\tbecause when I first learned the date, I was astounded: for a couple of years,<br \/>\n\t\tme and the Babe walked the same planet! OK, I mostly crawled, but then, so did<br \/>\n\t\tRuth in those years. Today, I am more amazed that Ruth <I>lasted<\/I> 53 years,<br \/>\n\t\tgiven the abuse his body endured. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>According to the special <I>Sporting News<\/I> edition that paid tribute<br \/>\n\t\tto Ruth &#8212; <I>Nation Mourns Ruth<\/I> was the headline &#8212; the Babe died without<br \/>\n\t\tever knowing the cause of his death. Which was throat cancer, officially &#8212; and<br \/>\n\t\tnot an overdose of saccharine induced by a choir of schoolkids singing &#8220;Take Me<br \/>\n\t\tOut to the Ballgame&#8221; outside his hospital window (as the William Bendix movie<br \/>\n\t\thas it.) That always struck me as odd, that his doctors and family refrained<br \/>\n\t\tfrom using &#8220;the C word&#8221; around Babe. It&#8217;s not like he didn&#8217;t have a right to<br \/>\n\t\tknow, y&#8217;know? <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Babe Ruth had rallied from a severe illness in the winter of 1946-47,<br \/>\n\t\tand attended the premiere of the Bendix film on July 26, 1948, just several<br \/>\n\t\tweeks before his death. According to Fred Lieb, his doctors let him leave<br \/>\n\t\tMemorial Hospital in N.Y. to travel to the Astor Theater with his wife Claire,<br \/>\n\t\tthinking &#8220;it might do him good.&#8221; However, they failed to preview the film. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>While the Babe gave it a weak &#8220;thumbs up&#8221; &#8212; saying in that husky voice,<br \/>\n\t\t&#8220;it was a good picture&#8221; &#8212; the popular movie summary of his life may have<br \/>\n\t\thastened his passing. Was Lieb suggesting this, when he commented, &#8220;What really<br \/>\n\t\twent through [Ruth&#8217;s] mind as he watched Bill Bendix portray Hollywood&#8217;s<br \/>\n\t\tversion of his legendary career and exploits will never be known.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>When Albert Nobel read his own obituary (oops!), he was so bothered by<br \/>\n\t\tthe way he would go down in history &#8212; as the inventor of dynamite, which had<br \/>\n\t\tbeen turned into a weapon of mass destruction in wars &#8212; he decided to set up a<br \/>\n\t\tfund to reward peacemakers. Jean Henri Dunant, who founded the Red Cross, was<br \/>\n\t\tco-recipient of the first Nobel Peace Prize in 1901 &#8212; five years after Albert<br \/>\n\t\tdied. My point is simply: how do we remember Nobel? <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Babe Ruth never recovered from Bendix&#8217; film, never had the opportunity<br \/>\n\t\tto work with a director on his own version of his life. Imagine the Babe living<br \/>\n\t\tanother 53 years &#8212; he&#8217;d be with us today, tossing out first balls, and we&#8217;d<br \/>\n\t\thave seen a lot of him last summer, out at the park watching McGwire and Sosa.<br \/>\n\t\tWhom would the Babe choose to do his auto-bio right? <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>I like to think the Babe would have welcomed Creamer&#8217;s book, and<br \/>\n\t\tinsisted that it be the basis for the script. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Given the Babe&#8217;s penchant for sampling a variety of the spices served up<br \/>\n\t\tby life, I also like to think he would have given a wink and a go-ahead nod to<br \/>\n\t\ta number of different directors over the years, each searching for &#8220;the real<br \/>\n\t\tRuth.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Ingmar Bergman, for example, opens his film with the Grim Reaper, draped<br \/>\n\t\tin black, and the Babe (smoking a cigar, in his underclothes), playing stud<br \/>\n\t\tpoker. The Reaper is frustrated at his inability to make Ruth appreciate the<br \/>\n\t\tserious nature of what is really at stake in the game. Drawing to an inside<br \/>\n\t\tstraight, Ruth comes up with a wild card bearing the number 60, which he slaps<br \/>\n\t\tdown with a guffaw. &#8220;Pretty good for an ugly orphan kid, right, chum?!&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Woody Allen might have tackled Ruth in his (Woody&#8217;s) early period. We<br \/>\n\t\tmight see Ruth visiting a hospital, with Woody playing the sick kid. &#8220;Gee,<br \/>\n\t\tBabe, do you think you could hit one for me today?&#8221; <I>Sure, kid.<\/I> &#8220;That<br \/>\n\t\twould be great, maybe one home run would clear up my sinuses. How about two,<br \/>\n\t\tBabe, think you could hit two?&#8221; <I>Well, kid, I&#8217;ll try my best.<\/I> &#8220;Try your<br \/>\n\t\tbest? Babe, I&#8217;m dying here, I got one chance in a million to live through the<br \/>\n\t\tnight, not that I want to put any pressure on you or anything, but geez, Babe,<br \/>\n\t\tcan&#8217;t you hit two for me?&#8221; <I>Sure, kid, I&#8217;ll hit two. You just keep the radio<br \/>\n\t\ton.<\/I> &#8220;How about one for my Uncle Harry, who is so sick he can&#8217;t even visit<br \/>\n\t\tme, not that he would anyway because he never liked me, it was always my<br \/>\n\t\tbrother Josh, but &#8212; &#8221; <I>Shut up, kid, or I&#8217;ll sit out today&#8217;s game.<\/I> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>With the money he made from suing the animators of <I>Babe, Pig in the<br \/>\n\t\tCity<\/I>, Ruth might hire Quentin Tarantino to give it a shot. In this one,<br \/>\n\t\tRobert DeNiro bulks up like he did for <I>Raging Bull<\/I>, to play the Babe who<br \/>\n\t\tjust can&#8217;t say No, especially to pasta. The Called Shot turns out to be an<br \/>\n\t\telaborate plot set up the night before when one of the Babe&#8217;s fans (played by<br \/>\n\t\tJoe Pesci) threatens Cub pitcher Charlie Root, taking a baseball bat to a<br \/>\n\t\tvariety of melons while making his point. The hit men hidden in the shadows at<br \/>\n\t\tWrigley Field (Travolta and Samuel Jackson) are never needed, but their<br \/>\n\t\tadventures on their way to the park provide enough action to guarantee success<br \/>\n\t\tat the box office. Bruce Willis plays Lou Gehrig, who almost has his streak<br \/>\n\t\tbroken when he is mistaken for a certain crooked boxer while driving home after<br \/>\n\t\tthe game. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>As usual, I am only scratching the surface here. Send me your movie<br \/>\n\t\tversions of &#8220;The Babe Ruth Story&#8221; for future <I>Notes<\/I>! <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B><U>SO CLOSE AND YET SO FAR DEPT. <\/U><\/B> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Anyone who has ever met a Cub fan knows that 1908 is fondly recalled as<br \/>\n\t\tthe last time the Cubs won the World Series. For Red Sox fans, it&#8217;s 1918, but<br \/>\n\t\tthen they always bring up 1986, when victory was snatched away in Game Six,<br \/>\n\t\twith one out to go. I am wondering why Cub fans do not bring up 1935 as much as<br \/>\n\t\tBoSox fans drag out 1986. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>My attention was drawn to 1935 when I was scanning a sketch of Tiger<br \/>\n\t\tStadium by Amadee in <I>Take Me Out to the Ballpark<\/I> (The Sporting News,<br \/>\n\t\t1983), and noticed a figure standing at third base with a large anchor chained<br \/>\n\t\tto his left ankle. The caption goes like this: &#8220;Where Stan Hack was stranded<br \/>\n\t\tafter opening 9th with triple in final game of &#8217;35 Series.&#8221; Naturally, I had to<br \/>\n\t\tlook up the rest of the story. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Something had to give, in the World Series of 1935. The Cubs had<br \/>\n\t\treturned to October&#8217;s Game in 1910, 1918, 1929, and 1932, and had been defeated<br \/>\n\t\teach time. Their last Series wins had come back-to-back against the Tigers, in<br \/>\n\t\t1907-08. The Tigers had lost again in 1909, and in 1934, for a perfect 0-4<br \/>\n\t\tOctober record. So something had to give, one streak was destined to be broken.<br \/>\n\t\t<\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>The Cubs took Game One, 3-0, in Detroit, then dropped the next one, 8-3.<br \/>\n\t\tGames Three and Four must have been heart-breakers, as the Cubs returned to<br \/>\n\t\tWrigley, only to lose 6-5 in eleven innings, and then 2-1 the next afternoon,<br \/>\n\t\tto go down three games to one. The Cubs salvaged the last home game, 3-1. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Back in Detroit for Game Six, the teams battled to a 3-3 tie through<br \/>\n\t\teight innings. Then Smiling Stan Hack led off the ninth with a triple &#8220;into<br \/>\n\t\tdeepest center field&#8221; (according to Robert Smith&#8217;s <I>World Series<\/I>, 1967.)<br \/>\n\t\t&#8220;When Hack pulled up at third, the stands were so silent that a man could hear<br \/>\n\t\tthe crunch of peanut shells ten rows away.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Tiger pitcher Tommy Bridges was in the pinch. He fanned Bill Jurges. Cub<br \/>\n\t\tpitcher Larry French batted next, and rolled one back to Bridges for the second<br \/>\n\t\tout. Charlie Grimm was the Cub manager that declined to go to his bench. It was<br \/>\n\t\tup to Augie Galan, who poked a long fly, hauled in by Goose Goslin. Hack<br \/>\n\t\tstranded at third, and yes, he might as well have been chained to an anchor.<br \/>\n\t\t<\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>In the bottom of the ninth, Mickey Cochrane got aboard on a hit that the<br \/>\n\t\tsecond baseman &#8220;just could not field cleanly.&#8221; Black Mike raced to second on<br \/>\n\t\tthe next ground ball out, then came around on Goose Goslin&#8217;s single. Game over,<br \/>\n\t\tSeries over, Tiger drought over, Cub streak intact. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><\/p>\n<p>\t <P>Imagine the contrast between the silence in the stadium after Hack&#8217;s<br \/>\n\t\tlead-off triple, and the roar after Goslin&#8217;s catch took Bridges off the hook. I<br \/>\n\t\tlove games with that kind of emotional range. I think most fans do. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B><U>THE BABE DIDN&#8217;T POINT <\/U><\/B> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>When I came across the book so titled &#8212; it&#8217;s by Bill Bryson (Iowa St U<br \/>\n\t\tPress, 1989), I was at first very disappointed. Why? Because I have been<br \/>\n\t\tthinking of writing a book about Ruth&#8217;s &#8220;Called Shot&#8221; myself, and it looked<br \/>\n\t\tlike I was scooped. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Wrong. Bryson&#8217;s sub-title is &#8220;and Other Stories about Iowans and<br \/>\n\t\tSports.&#8221; He devotes the first page and a half to the Called Shot, and that&#8217;s<br \/>\n\t\tit. I am relieved, and am looking forward to reading the rest of the book,<br \/>\n\t\twhich seems like a well-organized collection of baseball stories. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>The dust jacket has a photo of the Babe in a famous post-HR pose, bat<br \/>\n\t\tperpendicular, torso slightly twisted, eyes following the bleachers-bound ball.<br \/>\n\t\tOn the photo, in what appears to be Babe&#8217;s own handwriting, are these words:<br \/>\n\t\t&#8220;To My friend Bill Bryson, Sincerely Babe Ruth.&#8221; Was Bryson a friend of the<br \/>\n\t\tBambino&#8217;s? Did Ruth confide to him about the Called Shot? <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Bryson (1915-1986) was &#8220;Iowa&#8217;s premiere baseball writer&#8221; in a career<br \/>\n\t\tthat lasted nearly fifty years, according to the book&#8217;s intro &#8212; most likely<br \/>\n\t\twritten by one of his sons, as they compiled and edited the book. He seems to<br \/>\n\t\thave been a kindred spirit &#8212; a prolific writer who did not live near any major<br \/>\n\t\tleague parks. He did witness Larsen&#8217;s WS perfecto, Maz&#8217; HR, and Willie&#8217;s Catch,<br \/>\n\t\tbut chose as his greatest thrill, Ruth&#8217;s HR in the first All Star Game in 1933.<br \/>\n\t\t<\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Alas, his opening essay &#8220;The Babe Never Called His Famous Homer&#8221; &#8212;<br \/>\n\t\twhich is more accurate than the book&#8217;s title, since Babe <I>did<\/I> point &#8212;<br \/>\n\t\tsheds no new light on the issue. Bryson knew Charlie Root (a manager in Des<br \/>\n\t\tMoines in the 50s), and as we all know, Root always said if Ruth <I>had<\/I><br \/>\n\t\tcalled his shot, Root would have stuck the ball in his ear. He also quotes Root<br \/>\n\t\tsaying, as a clincher, &#8220;Ruth himself never said he pointed.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Bryson does mention a 1944 interview of Ruth by James Carmichael of the<br \/>\n\t\t<I>Chicago Daily News<\/I>, in which Ruth was quoted: &#8220;Right now I want to<br \/>\n\t\tsettle all arguments. I didn&#8217;t exactly point to any spot, like the flagpole &#8230;<br \/>\n\t\tI just sorta waved at the whole fence.&#8221; The only locker room quote from Ruth<br \/>\n\t\tafter the game that <I>NY Times<\/I> sportswriter William E. Brandt took home<br \/>\n\t\twas this, after someone praised the Babe and Gehrig for each hitting two HRs:<br \/>\n\t\t&#8220;Aw, go on now, the wind was with us, that&#8217;s all. Any time they let us hit into<br \/>\n\t\tthe air, zowie &#8212; the wind did the rest.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><I>Zowie? Aw, go on now?<\/I> I am guessing that Mr Brandt may have<br \/>\n\t\tpapered over a few expletives there, but maybe not. An editor&#8217;s note after the<br \/>\n\t\tessay passes along this tidbit, which was news to me. During the game, Ruth did<br \/>\n\t\tgesture &#8212; &#8220;to alert park personnel that part of a temporary wooden railing<br \/>\n\t\tatop the outfield wall had broken loose and was in danger of falling onto the<br \/>\n\t\tfield. The repairs were made, Ruth saved the day. What a guy! <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B>FROM THE ARCHIVES OF NOTES <\/B><\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>The Called Shot was a main topic in a hot stove issue of <I>Notes<\/I><br \/>\n\t\t(#52, February 5, 1994). Fox had aired its special on the subject, and I had<br \/>\n\t\trecently been perusing <I>The Joe Williams Baseball Reader <\/I>(Algonquin Books<br \/>\n\t\tof Chapel Hill, 1989.) Here is what I came up with when I started putting<br \/>\n\t\tthings together. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B><U>THE FICKLE FINGER OF THE BABE <\/U><\/B> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><\/p>\n<p>\t <P>My poem <I><B>Called Shot<\/B><\/I> appeared here last October, and I&#8217;ve<br \/>\n\t\tsurely made enough references to this &#8220;event&#8221; over the past eleven (!) months,<br \/>\n\t\tthat my view of it is pretty well known: George Herman did <I>not<\/I> say Read<br \/>\n\t\tMy Finger, and the idea of the &#8220;called shot&#8221; was hype, pure and simple &#8230; OK,<br \/>\n\t\tmaybe just simple. Let&#8217;s not be that naive. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Yet here we are in February 1994, and the Fox Network is spending an<br \/>\n\t\thour on this &#8220;controversial&#8221; subject. I hate to sound like a Grinch, but it&#8217;s<br \/>\n\t\tonly controversial for those who haven&#8217;t done much reading of the eye- and<br \/>\n\t\tear-witness accounts &#8230; OK, maybe that&#8217;s who Fox is targeting. Who reads<br \/>\n\t\tanymore? <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8220;Apparently the story is too good to die,&#8221; wrote Joe Williams, a<br \/>\n\t\treporter who was as close to Ruth as anyone in that era. &#8220;So it lives on, true<br \/>\n\t\tor untrue, depending on the version you wish to accept.&#8221; Williams could never<br \/>\n\t\tdraw Ruth out on the topic, and concluded that he deliberately avoided the<br \/>\n\t\tquestion. Ruth&#8217;s manager never agreed with the legendary version. Yankee Art<br \/>\n\t\tFletcher stated &#8220;There was no talk about it in the dugout at the time.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>That&#8217;s what Williams wrote in 1965, but it was his story in 1932 that<br \/>\n\t\tgave birth to the myth. Joe Williams was the only journalist to see the<br \/>\n\t\tmiracle, and his reputation gave the story credibility. As Williams talked to<br \/>\n\t\tmore and more players, he realized that he had created &#8212; not a Frankenstein,<br \/>\n\t\tbut a Santa Claus &#8212; for a country full of Virginias. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B>The story <I>is<\/I> too good to die. Because the fantasy shows how<br \/>\n\t\tBabe Ruth was regarded by America&#8217;s fans: <I>he was that good, he might have<br \/>\n\t\tdone it. He was that cocky &#8212; yeah, maybe he did call the homer<\/I>. Sixty-some<br \/>\n\t\tyears (and counting) later, what happened is much less important than what was<br \/>\n\t\t<I>believed<\/I>. And that French proverb comes into play again: for those who<br \/>\n\t\tbelieve, no explanation is necessary; for those who do not believe, none is<br \/>\n\t\tpossible. <\/B> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>In 1953, Williams even reported a &#8220;deposition&#8221; by prizefighter Mickey<br \/>\n\t\tWalker, a pal of Ruth&#8217;s. Walker and a hotel man had the Babe &#8220;nibbling on<br \/>\n\t\tnutritious, body-building scotch&#8221; one night, when they pinned him down. Ruth:<br \/>\n\t\t&#8220;I had two strikes on me and the pitcher was levelling with speed curves. We<br \/>\n\t\twere kiddin&#8217; one another and I swept my arm, motioning to the outfield, trying<br \/>\n\t\tto rib him into a fastball. I was waiting for the pitch and when it came I<br \/>\n\t\tbelted the ball over the centerfield fence.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B><U>YOU BE THE UMPIRE <\/U><\/B> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8220;It will never be known for certain, but on-deck hitter Lou Gehrig<br \/>\n\t\tinsisted that Ruth had meant to call his home run and point out where it would<br \/>\n\t\tgo.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8212; <I>20th Century Baseball Chronicle<\/I>, 1991 (!) <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8220;Gehrig said he read about it in the papers the next day. &#8216;And that was<br \/>\n\t\tthe first I&#8217;d heard about the Babe &#8220;calling&#8221; the shot.'&#8221; &#8212; <B>Joe<br \/>\n\t\tWilliams<\/B>, 7\/14\/65 <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8220;He really didn&#8217;t do it, you know. I hate to explode one of baseball&#8217;s<br \/>\n\t\tgreat legends, but I was there and saw what happened. Sure, he made a gesture,<br \/>\n\t\the pointed &#8212; but it wasn&#8217;t to call his shot. Listen, he was a great hitter and<br \/>\n\t\ta great character, but do you think he would have put himself on the spot like<br \/>\n\t\tthat?&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8212;<B> Billy Herman<\/B> in <I>The Glory of Their Times <\/I><\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><I> <\/I><\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> &#8220;[Charlie Root] used to tell me that there was no way Babe Ruth could<br \/>\n\t\thave done that to him and gotten away with it. Charlie Grimm told me the same<br \/>\n\t\tthing. &#8216;Root would have put that next pitch right into Ruth&#8217;s ear if Babe had<br \/>\n\t\ttried that on him,&#8217; he said. Root was that way. He had a reputation as a<br \/>\n\t\thead-hunter.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8212; <B>Gene Conley<\/B> in <I>A Donald Honig Reader<\/I> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8220;He hit two home runs in that game and so did Gehrig, but as usual Ruth<br \/>\n\t\twas the center of things. Here&#8217;s what he said: <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8220;&#8216;I was out at the hospital this morning and I told a little kid I was<br \/>\n\t\tgonna hit him a home run today.&#8217; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8220;Mrs Sewell told me later that when Babe came up she heard Mrs Ruth call<br \/>\n\t\tout to him, &#8216;Remember the little boy.&#8217; And that&#8217;s when he pointed out and hit<br \/>\n\t\tthe home run. He&#8217;d already hit one, but I guess he figured that wasn&#8217;t enough.<br \/>\n\t\t<\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8220;Do I believe he really called it? Yes sir. I was there. I saw it. I<br \/>\n\t\tdon&#8217;t care what anybody says. He did it. He probably couldn&#8217;t have done it<br \/>\n\t\tagain in a thousand years, but he did it that time.&#8221; &#8212; Teammate <B>Joe<br \/>\n\t\tSewell<\/B> in <I>Honig<\/I> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>&#8220;The next thing you know some newspapermen are saying he&#8217;d pointed to<br \/>\n\t\tthe center-field bleachers, and people are believing it. Ruth went along with<br \/>\n\t\tit, and why not? Just to show you how some people can be led along, I had a<br \/>\n\t\tgood friend who was at the game, and he swore to me later that Ruth pointed to<br \/>\n\t\tthe bleachers. &#8216;Forget it,&#8217; I&#8217;d tell him, &#8216;I don&#8217;t want to hear about it.'&#8221; &#8212;<br \/>\n\t\t<B>Burleigh Grimes<\/B> in <I>Honig<\/I> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B><U>A POSTSCRIPT ON THE &#8220;CALLED SHOT&#8221; AND MR. RUTH <\/U><\/B> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>I wrote the above before I watched the Fox <I>Front Page<\/I> segment on<br \/>\n\t\tRuth&#8217;s &#8220;called shot,&#8221; which featured the never-before-telecast &#8220;Zapruder film<br \/>\n\t\tof baseball.&#8221; In case you missed it, a fan named Matt Campbell had his home<br \/>\n\t\tmovie camera at Wrigley Field that day in 1932 when the legend was born, and<br \/>\n\t\tthe lens were open at the decisive moment. Unfortunately, Mr Campbell did not<br \/>\n\t\thave box seats, so our view is from well behind third base. Mr. C. also kept a<br \/>\n\t\tjournal, by the way, and noted there that he had caught the Babe hitting two<br \/>\n\t\thomers, on his film, but mentions no gestures. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><I>Front Page<\/I> assembled an interesting jury. The Babe&#8217;s daughter<br \/>\n\t\tnoted her dad &#8220;had a flair for doing the right thing at the right time,&#8221; and<br \/>\n\t\tafter viewing the film, exclaimed, &#8220;He really did.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Robert Creamer, who bio&#8217;d Babe, repeated the saying &#8220;all the lies about<br \/>\n\t\tBabe are true,&#8221; then concluded that the argument about The Shot &#8220;doesn&#8217;t matter<br \/>\n\t\ta damn&#8221; &#8212; Ruth homered in response to taunting, and that&#8217;s all that counts.<\/p>\n<p>\t\t(He noted that the crowd was wowed by the blast, as it was one of the longest<br \/>\n\t\tseen at Wrigley.) <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Several fans who were at the game, after viewing the film, were<br \/>\n\t\tconvinced that their memories were correct: Fan A, that Babe &#8220;in a very<br \/>\n\t\tarrogant way, pointed out to where he was going to hit a home run&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;I saw<br \/>\n\t\tit!&#8221; Fan B saw nothing like that. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Mickey Mantle and a group of ex-Yanks were shown the film, and Mantle<br \/>\n\t\trecalled how he himself once called his shot, a game-winning homer in the 1964<br \/>\n\t\tSeries. &#8220;I called them about 500 times &#8212; that was the only one I hit!&#8221; he<br \/>\n\t\tadded. Reggie Jackson said &#8220;it had to be a Reggie Jackson or Babe Ruth type, a<br \/>\n\t\tMuhammad Ali type&#8221; of person to pull it off. After viewing the film, Reggie<br \/>\n\t\tsaid, &#8220;He was jawing &#8212; I don&#8217;t see a called shot here.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>For some reason, <I>Front Page<\/I> did not mention Joe Williams and his<br \/>\n\t\t<I>World Telegram<\/I> story, the seed that sprouted the legend. (The <I>NY<br \/>\n\t\tTimes<\/I> mentioned gestures, but none of the other print reports, and I think<br \/>\n\t\tthere were 16 in all, noted anything unusual.) <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Cub SS Billy Jurges (who had a great view) thought at first Ruth called<br \/>\n\t\tit, but then talked with catcher Gabby Hartnett, who told him Ruth was saying,<br \/>\n\t\t&#8220;that&#8217;s only two strikes.&#8221; Debunking is not pretty, and Jurges went on to say<br \/>\n\t\tthat he hoped this would not be the end of the legend, which is &#8220;good for<br \/>\n\t\tbaseball&#8221;. Bob Costas had a similar sentiment: &#8220;I&#8217;d like to believe&#8230;.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Mike Lupica&#8217;s final remarks were thoughtful. Are heroes still possible?<br \/>\n\t\tOr does the tabloid treatment eventually cut everyone down to size, because<br \/>\n\t\tthat&#8217;s what we want today? &#8220;In the golden age they only knew what they wanted<br \/>\n\t\tto know, and what they wanted to know was that their sports stars were heroes.&#8221;<br \/>\n\t\tLupica concludes, &#8220;Maybe the problem is that we don&#8217;t want heroes anymore,&#8221; and<br \/>\n\t\twe can&#8217;t blame the athletes, &#8220;we did it to ourselves.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B><U>REFLECTIONS ON BASEBALL&#8217;S SUMMER INTERMEZZO <\/U><\/B> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>To be honest, the only time I really looked forward to the All Star Game<br \/>\n\t\twas 1994, when I had tickets. Most other summers, I slightly resent the<br \/>\n\t\tinterruption in the daily grind of the races (especially if my team is hot),<br \/>\n\t\tand the break cannot end soon enough. My collection of All Star memories is not<br \/>\n\t\tvast or particularly interesting. Exhibition games, y&#8217;know? <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>In my first years of rooting, the &#8216;Star Game seemed much more important<br \/>\n\t\tto watch than it has in recent years. Of course, it was in the afternoon, and I<br \/>\n\t\twas out of school. I mostly wanted to see how the players from the Pirates did.<br \/>\n\t\tOnce they were out, so was I. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>I do recall liking early on, the idea of rotating the Game around the<br \/>\n\t\tleagues, with each city taking its proper turn. Going to the Game when it came<br \/>\n\t\tto Pittsburgh, as it did in 1959, was never an option. (I never thought I&#8217;d<br \/>\n\t\tmake it to Disneyworld, either.) But I was proud to see old Forbes Field in<br \/>\n\t\tnational TV &#8212; <I>that<\/I> game, I probably watched, and perhaps tried to<br \/>\n\t\tscore. I recall scoring just one time &#8212; it could have been &#8217;59 &#8212; but because<br \/>\n\t\tit was such a headache with all the changes, once was enough. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>This time around, I got to wondering whatever happened to that neat<br \/>\n\t\tpattern of rotating the Game. I did a little research, and found out that the<br \/>\n\t\tpattern never was perfect, even the first time around: the second and tenth<br \/>\n\t\tgames were both held at the Polo Grounds, while the Phillies did not get to<br \/>\n\t\tplay host as the original sixteen franchises passed the baton. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>When the second round began, the pattern vanished right after the<br \/>\n\t\tseventeenth game was played at old Comiskey, where the thing started in 1933.<br \/>\n\t\tThe next game went to Detroit, another AL city. The 22nd game went to Milwaukee<br \/>\n\t\t(NL), the 25th to Baltimore, and the 27th (the AL&#8217;s turn) to Los Angeles. The<br \/>\n\t\t&#8220;new&#8221; franchises, and then the expansion cities, totally confused things. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Interleague plague, mass movement of players (even All Stars) between<br \/>\n\t\tthe AL &amp; NL &#8212; I don&#8217;t think the rivalry is anything like it was, once upon<br \/>\n\t\ta time. Does the Home Run Derby get higher ratings now? This time around, there<br \/>\n\t\twas squawking about letting fans vote on the internet (apparently a late wave<br \/>\n\t\tof e-votes from New England buoyed Nomar G. over Derek J., for the starting AL<br \/>\n\t\tSS role.) So it goes. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>I tuned in the event itself only intermittently, on radio and TV. I<br \/>\n\t\tmissed the consensus highlight, Ted Williams the center of attention, a flash<br \/>\n\t\tof fine Fenway fantasyland. Then Red Sox (for now) hurler Ramon Martinez fans<br \/>\n\t\tfive (high fives all around), summoning the ghost of Carl Hubbell to join in<br \/>\n\t\tthe fun. I am looking forward to reading all about the Boston &#8216;Star Party in<br \/>\n\t\tthe next <I>Buffalo Head Society<\/I> magazine. Play it again! <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B><U>DIARY OF A BASEBALL JUNKIE &#8212; Part 3 <\/U><\/B> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>July has been sweltering, even here in the <I>Shadows<\/I> of<br \/>\n\t\tCooperstown, and even at Murnane Field (all night games), and even after<br \/>\n\t\tsundowns. I think the heat has kept the crowds down &#8212; I know I missed a few<br \/>\n\t\tgames when it was too hot to move much. But I&#8217;ve made more than I&#8217;ve missed,<br \/>\n\t\tand on one five-game home stand, I think I caught at least parts of each<br \/>\n\t\tcontest. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>How long I stayed depended mostly upon the company I had. With certain<br \/>\n\t\tfan friends, I almost always go the distance. (That is, I stay till the last<br \/>\n\t\tout.) When I wind up alone, I am more likely to bail out early. I wouldn&#8217;t<br \/>\n\t\tleave a no-hitter in progress, but the score is not a factor, I might hang<br \/>\n\t\taround till the end of a <I>rare<\/I> blowout, or leave midway thru a tie game.<br \/>\n\t\tI&#8217;ve missed a few late-inning rallies this summer, and I regret that. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>There were seasons, not so long ago, when I could take my kids along for<br \/>\n\t\tcompany. Sometimes they even got into the games, and fought over who would keep<br \/>\n\t\tscore in my scorebook. Then they went mainly to hang out with friends, and now<br \/>\n\t\tthey are both driving and so are their friends, but not to baseball games. I am<\/p>\n<p>\t\tlooking forward to the seasons when I can take <I>their<\/I> kids to the<br \/>\n\t\tballpark, but I can wait five or ten years for that. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>The Blue Sox are a hard-to-follow team. If you don&#8217;t go to the park, you<br \/>\n\t\thave to read the local paper. The local TV and radio stations give scores, but<br \/>\n\t\tnot much else, and none of the games, home or away, are televised or broadcast.<br \/>\n\t\tI&#8217;m convinced this missing link is a big factor in the attendance. I cannot<br \/>\n\t\timagine how thin my memories of the Pirates would be, if had only my ballpark<br \/>\n\t\tvisits and the newspapers to feed them. Radio and TV lure fans to the park,<br \/>\n\t\traise anticipation, set the stage. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Worth noting is a recent in-game promotion that was great fun. Fans were<br \/>\n\t\tinvited to drop their names into a box in the first few innings. Five names<br \/>\n\t\twere drawn, and these lucky fans got a chance to win a new ($15,000) Saturn, if<br \/>\n\t\tthey could toss a baseball thru a hole in a wooden panel, from 60&#8217;6&#8243; away &#8212;<br \/>\n\t\tfrom the mound to home plate. As it turned out, no one even hit the board, but<br \/>\n\t\tthe suspense was terrific! (My name was not drawn.) <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>The problem was that the promotion received no publicity in advance of<br \/>\n\t\tthe game, as near as I can tell. So not one fan came on the chance of winning a<br \/>\n\t\tcar. This did increase the odds for the thousand-plus who showed, on a rainy<br \/>\n\t\tnight (the game started about 90 minutes late), but I think some good publicity<br \/>\n\t\tmight have filled the stands. On &#8220;Wegman&#8217;s Night&#8221; in Syracuse, just down the<br \/>\n\t\tthruway, the park is filled annually by fans who come to see if they can drive<br \/>\n\t\ta new car home. It&#8217;s a raffle, and everyone in the park has a shot, and the car<br \/>\n\t\t<I>will<\/I> be won. It&#8217;s great, and the winner is drawn <I>after<\/I> the game<br \/>\n\t\t(the Blue Sox did it mid-5th), so everyone sticks around and the concession<br \/>\n\t\tstands boom. Bill Veecks aren&#8217;t born every day, and perhaps they cannot be<br \/>\n\t\tmade. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><B><U>TIME WARPS <\/U><\/B> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Tom Ruane recently noted on the SABR internet digest how &#8220;suspended&#8221;<br \/>\n\t\tgames can make for interesting problems for baseball&#8217;s record bookkeepers. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>For instance, Barry Bonds made his major league debut on May 30, 1986.<br \/>\n\t\tYet, his first major league hit came in a game played on April 20, same season.<br \/>\n\t\tHuh? Well, that April game was suspended, and completed in August, when Bonds,<br \/>\n\t\twho was now on the Bucs&#8217; roster, came through with a game-winning single in the<br \/>\n\t\t17th inning. The game went into the book as an April 20 game, the date it<br \/>\n\t\tbegan. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Tom also noted that the suspended Astros-Padres game might affect Tony<br \/>\n\t\tGwynn&#8217;s 3,000th hit. If he passes 3,000, then gets a hit in the suspended game<br \/>\n\t\tlater on, does his 2,999th hit now become elevated to the magic number? I would<br \/>\n\t\tguess not &#8212; but if you tried making a list of all 3,000+ Gwynn hits, using a<br \/>\n\t\tbook that catalogs box scores in chronological order &#8212; you might conclude<br \/>\n\t\tsomething else. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>What if a suspended game occurs in the middle a hitting streak for<br \/>\n\t\trookie pheenom Joe Dee? Going into the suspended game, Joe has hit in 28<br \/>\n\t\tstraight. <I>In<\/I> the suspended game, Joe goes hitless through five innings.<br \/>\n\t\tThen, after connecting in 28 more games, his streak is stopped (again?) A week<br \/>\n\t\tlater, the suspended game is resumed. Is the pressure now on for Joe to get a<br \/>\n\t\thit, to bridge the gap and break DiMaggio&#8217;s record? <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>If Joe Dee was a Yankee &#8212; would there be pressure on his manager to sit<br \/>\n\t\tJoe for the last innings in the resumed game? Would Steinbrenner step in and<br \/>\n\t\tpull off a trade to prevent Joe&#8217;s chance to break the streak of the Clipper?<br \/>\n\t\tWould the Commish intervene to prevent either of these moves? <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Keep this quirky rule in mind, next time someone asks you if a pitcher<br \/>\n\t\tcan be credited with a win and loss in the same game &#8212; that could happen. Can<br \/>\n\t\ta player hit a home run for both teams in the same game? Yup, if he&#8217;s traded to<br \/>\n\t\tthe right team. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Imagine a pitcher being traded, after fanning fifteen batters for the<br \/>\n\t\thome team in five innings in a game suspended after 4&frac12; &#8212; he then<br \/>\n\t\t&#8220;starts&#8221; the resumed game, now hurling for the visitors, and fans fifteen more,<br \/>\n\t\tfor a fantastic total of 30 K&#8217;s (no dropped third strikes) in 9 innings! <I>It<br \/>\n\t\tcould happen!<\/I> And it would be a record <I>very<\/I> hard to break!! <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>If you can come up with other Bizarro World scenarios, please send them<br \/>\n\t\tthis way for a future issue of <I>NOTES<\/I>. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P><U>LAST UPS: A TALE OF TWO TEMPORARY CITIES <\/U> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>The weekend of July 23-25 has been anticipated here in the Shadows of<br \/>\n\t\tCooperstown since last winter, with a mix of dread and joy. While the country<br \/>\n\t\tof baseball pilgrimaged to its mecca to honor the Class of &#8217;99, the country of<br \/>\n\t\tMTV converged on Rome, NY, for Woodstock &#8217;99. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>It was the biggest turnout ever, for both cities. Well over 200,000 fans<br \/>\n\t\tof groups like Metallica, Korn, and the Red Hot Chili Peppers camped out at the<br \/>\n\t\tformer Griffiss Air Force Base &#8212; a site I once proposed here in <I>Notes<\/I><br \/>\n\t\t(#33, 9\/19\/93) for the baseball theme park, &#8220;Ballpark USA.&#8221; An estimated fifty<br \/>\n\t\tthousand fans of guys like Nolan Ryan and Robin Yount flocked into baseball&#8217;s<br \/>\n\t\tcapitol. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>The traffic jams on the NY Thruway that almost everyone had predicted,<br \/>\n\t\tfailed to happen. The two-lane roads surrounding both cities were packed at<br \/>\n\t\ttimes, but things kept moving. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Both events were in the national eye, thanks to MTV and ESPN. (In the<br \/>\n\t\tShadows, the local media also kept vigil.) It was an interesting weekend &#8230;<br \/>\n\t\tWillie Mays and Willie Nelson, Bush the politician and Bush the singer &#8230;<br \/>\n\t\tGeorges Brett and Clinton &#8230; the tragically flip (Pete Rose) and The<br \/>\n\t\tTragically Hip &#8230; Hornsbys Roger and Bruce &#8230; fans wooed and nude, all baking<br \/>\n\t\tunder the same summer sun. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>I prefer to tape the Hall of Fame Inductions, rather than attend. If I<br \/>\n\t\tcould have a remote with fast forward, I would be there in person. I feel the<br \/>\n\t\tsame way about graduations, by the way. And if I shied away from the<br \/>\n\t\tCooperstown crowds, imagine how far I stayed away from Woodstock &#8217;99. My kids<br \/>\n\t\tboth went Saturday night, and were disgusted by the garbage scene, but my son<br \/>\n\t\treturned Sunday for some groups he likes. Walked right in, both days, by the<br \/>\n\t\tway, security was probably tighter at the Hall. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>There were no bonfires, vandalism or looting in Cooperstown, but if the<br \/>\n\t\t200,000+ had descended on that city, instead of Rome, there would have been<br \/>\n\t\tproblems. Some of the troubles at Woodstock were in reaction to commercialism<br \/>\n\t\t(not to play down the drugs, the heat, and the bands who incited rioting.) In<br \/>\n\t\tCooperstown, there was also a lot of over-priced stuff (including autographs)<br \/>\n\t\tselling briskly everywhere. But the baseball folks generally kept their pants<br \/>\n\t\ton &#8212; literally and figuratively. (This was not the case with Disco Demolition<br \/>\n\t\tNight, two decades ago, when fans rioted enough around a bonfire to cause a<br \/>\n\t\tgame to be forfeited.) <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>I skimmed through the speeches by the rookie &#8216;Famers, and especially<br \/>\n\t\tthrough Bud Selig. At one point I was wishing he was on the East Stage, at the<br \/>\n\t\tcity to the north, where he surely would have been pelted with water bottles.<br \/>\n\t\tSelig still smells to me like the Strike of &#8217;94-95, and now 2001 is getting<br \/>\n\t\twithin range. The odors of Woodstock were not pleasant either, but they will<br \/>\n\t\tpass, far swifter than those of The Strike. <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P> <\/P><br \/>\n\t <P>Woodstock &#8217;99 cannot be compared to Hall of Fame Weekend, we all know<br \/>\n\t\tthat (or to Woodstock &#8217;69.) Yet, I seemed to have done just that. Maybe<br \/>\n\t\tbaseball <I>is<\/I> connected to everything else. <\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WHEN DAVID BECAME GOLIATH One of the things about baseball that endears it to writers is that the event can be missed, but written about almost endlessly. I never saw Babe Ruth&#8217;s &#8220;called shot,&#8221; yet I can plan to write a whole book on the topic (it would include four pages of this issue of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11360","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11360","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11360\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}