{"id":14522,"date":"2011-06-15T23:14:56","date_gmt":"2011-06-16T06:14:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.seamheads.com\/?p=14522"},"modified":"2011-06-15T23:14:56","modified_gmt":"2011-06-16T06:14:56","slug":"white-sox-may-need-a-lesson-in-their-own-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/2011\/06\/15\/white-sox-may-need-a-lesson-in-their-own-history\/","title":{"rendered":"White Sox May Need a Lesson in Their Own History"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I  was visiting Chicago recently on a trip from baseball\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s \u00e2\u20ac\u0153land of milk  and honey,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d also known as Philadelphia, and had the opportunity to take  in a ballgame and cross another stadium visit off my list..  Chicago,  baseball, Cubs, Wrigley is how the order of it all plays out in my mind  when I think of the Windy City.  Unfortunately the Cubbies were in  Philly, which destroyed any thoughts of an afternoon at \u00e2\u20ac\u0153the friendly  confines\u00e2\u20ac\u009d soaking in the sun and the nostalgia.  The White Sox were in  town, but I have to admit that knowing you are going to Chicago to see a  baseball game but finding out you will be getting a ticket to US  Cellular Field is pretty much the equivalent of being told you are going  to the college basketball Final Four only to find out it is for the  women\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s and not the men\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s bracket.<\/p>\n<p>I have to give US Cellular  Field credit though for living down (up?) to its reviews and not being a  real impressive cathedral to the game or the team it houses.  The field  should be used as a template in what to avoid when building a  stadium and ignoring some quality history from a franchise that has it  to offer.  The Cubs may be the lovable losers in the city and the  country for that matter, but the Pale Hose have what I believe to be  some outstanding players and interesting championship teams from an era  long ago and evidently forgotten.  When going to a park for the first  time I always like to see how they celebrate great teams and players of  the past and felt that US Cellular had some real potential to educate  fans on some of the true ChiSox greats that have donned the iconic S-O-X  emblem.  Being a Black Sox junkie I already had some knowledge of the  players from that time period aside from \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Shoeless\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Joe Jackson.  I  accepted before even researching that Jackson and the infamous 1919  squad would be not recognized in any way, which I was fine with.<\/p>\n<p>Before  my trip I checked the internet to see what the stadium had to offer as  far as plaques, monuments or statues that I could visit while there.   They had the usual suspects that I had anticipated in Carlton Fisk,  Nellie Fox and Luis Aparicio along with a huge memorial in front of the  stadium honoring the 2005 World Series team, a team that was as  memorable and distinct as a Brendan Fraser movie.  What stood out to me most was the lack of acknowledgement from a franchise that has been playing for well over  100 years of prior championship teams and  some Hall of Fame players that would be worth sharing with their current  and future fan base.  I believe an organization&#8217;s job is to keep the level of  interest up for the current team but at the same time promote and  educate those fans who look around and want to find the legendary teams  and mythic icons of the past, even if it was close to a century ago.<\/p>\n<p>I  question how many people know that the White Sox have more to offer  than just a 1919 team, who is to infamy what the 1927 Yanks are to glory, and also offer icons beyond the romantic lore of a banned  \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Shoeless\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Joe.  I have nothing against the Sox players who have statues  and retired numbers there, like Harold Baines and Billy Pierce, but there  are others who should have come before\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6.wayyyyy before, them.  What  players or teams do I think got the short end of the fungo bat, you ask,  when it comes to proper recognition?<\/p>\n<p>The first one is a no-brainer and I cannot figure out the logic in not including him, and that  is Hall of Fame second baseman Eddie Collins.  I would argue that  Collins should be in any conversation that starts by asking, \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcWho is the  best second baseman of all time?\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 \u00c2\u00a0 Collins played 12  years for the Sox, had a lifetime average with them of .331, an OPS of  .849 and collected over 2,000 hits on his way to 3,000 during an era  when a team\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s best player was not necessarily its second baseman.  On  top of that he played for the 1917 World Series winning team where he  batted over .400 and was one of the few star players not implicated in  the 1919 scandal.  Let\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s review; not just a Hall of Famer but an  all-time great, over 3,000 hits, a .333 lifetime average, played on one  World Series winning team for a franchise that has only won three and  rose above the controversy of the 1919 team.  And they put up a statue  of Harold \u00e2\u20ac\u01531,700 plus hits, a .288 average and no title with the Sox\u00e2\u20ac\u009d  Baines?  I am sure Baines is a super guy but the only way he is getting  to Cooperstown is if he drives there.  Sorry.<\/p>\n<p>Even the fact  that the 1917 team that Collins played on gets no love is a head-scratcher.  That team was loaded with, alongside Collins, Hall of Famers  Ray Schalk and pitcher Red Faber, plus the greatest Sox player of  all-time, Joe Jackson.  In a 154-game season these guys won 100 games,  which is not too shabby, and beat the 98-win New York Giants, who were  led by Hall of Fame skipper John McGraw and were somewhat of a dynasty  in the making.  At the time the Giants were making their fourth World  Series appearance in the past seven seasons.  In other words the Sox did  not beat some 80-win wild card team.  I read the other day on a Red Sox  blog that was looking at the BoSox&#8217;s chance of winning 100 games this  year, that 96 times a team has won at least 100 games in a season and  only 34 times did that team go onto capture the title.  Not an easy task  in winning that many games, and by no means does it guarantee the  ultimate hardware, as the stats show.  Is this 1917 team not one that I  want the next generation of fans to know about?  White Sox fans please  help me understand, is everyone in the front office drinking that toxic  river water?<\/p>\n<p>It is a question asked before each season and is  usually answered with a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153no\u00e2\u20ac\u009d by the all-star break and that is, will a  pitcher ever win 30 games in a season again?  How about this trivia  question, who was the last pitcher to win 40 games in a season?  That  would be Sox Hall of Fame pitcher Ed Walsh, who in 1908 went 40-15.  Now unless the Phillies switch to a three-man rotation to get Roy  Halladay more starts, I feel safe in saying that mark will never come  close to being touched again.  In addition to having a season for the  ages in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc08, Walsh also led the 1906 ChiSox to their first championship  ever over the 116-win crosstown rival Cubs by winning two World Series  games.  This was considered one of the bigger World Series upsets in  history, and not just because of the Cubs&#8217; staggering win total.  Walsh  helped lead a team dubbed \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Hitless Wonders,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d aptly given to them for  having the lowest team batting average in the AL for the 1906 season.   They lived up to the name, and then some, in the World Series by batting  a collective .198.  Despite the anemic offense the Sox and Walsh  prevailed.  Walsh is a Hall of Famer, a 40-win season on his resume, and  won two games in the postseason for a team known for their lack of  offense AND beat their shared city rivals in the process.  How could  this be overlooked?<\/p>\n<p>So we have a Baines and Pierce tribute but  no Collins or Walsh.  A 2005 memorial, but nothing for a stacked 1917  team that won 100 games and a 1906 one that upset their sworn enemies at  a time when baseball meant everything to a city.  If you are lucky  enough to have legends, amazing teams and mythical stories that you want  passed on to show the roots of your franchise than you have to get it  out there to the public.  It is a disservice to the game to not promote  this in your own ballpark. I fear that if you are not a history buff  then eras like this will soon be forgotten.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pickoffs<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>2011 Topps Pro Debut came out June 1st which marks the first minor  league baseball cards of the year.  Even more excited to see that the  Topps Heritage product line is coming out with a 1962 throwback minor  league edition in September.  I already see myself getting a box of each  under the cover of that it is for my boys.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>After completely  going off on the Sox about questionable players being immortalized, I  have to admit that I do think the D-backs should do something to honor  Casey Daigle and what he has done.  Daigle pitched for Arizona in 2004  &amp; 2006 throwing 61 of his 71 current career innings there.  He may  not have Hall of Fame numbers but he married Jennie Finch which makes  him an all-time great in my book.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>I am liking the 15-team  realignment talk, but just not the two 15-team divisions where the top  six teams in each make the post season.  How do you get pumped for a  late September game where your team is trying to secure sixth place?   Three divisions with five teams each works for me, there is something  magical about divisional races and I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t want to see that lost.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Next time you are flipping and come across MLB Tonight on the MLB  Network check to see if former big leaguer Eric Byrnes is one of the  analysts.  Byrnes is hilarious and answers the question of whatever  happened to Jeff Spicoli when he left Ridgemont High.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Matt  Aber is a baseball enthusiast who was disappointed to learn that  Commissioner Selig did not tab him to run the Dodgers operations when  MLB took control of the team in April.  Matt wonders if his competence  and ability to make sound decisions worked against him in getting an  interview with the Commish.  Matt is an advocate of the national  organization called The Miracle League which allows special needs  children to play baseball.  He encourages you to support this worthy  cause and learn more at <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.miracleleague.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">www.miracleleague.com<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><label id=\"MessagingSendReplyButton\" for=\"u347480_5\"><\/label><\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was visiting Chicago recently on a trip from baseball\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s \u00e2\u20ac\u0153land of milk and honey,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d also known as Philadelphia, and had the opportunity to take in a ballgame and cross another stadium visit off my list.. Chicago, baseball, Cubs, Wrigley is how the order of it all plays out in my mind when I think [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":301,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[4618,132,714,2910,14918,2508,5735,14910,14917,14913,14911,6923,14914,3017,14915,4610,14912,14916,14170,2212],"class_list":["post-14522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","tag-ballgame","tag-baseball-game","tag-black-sox","tag-chicago-baseball","tag-college-basketball","tag-cubbies","tag-final-four","tag-friendly-confines","tag-going-to-chicago","tag-impressive-cathedral","tag-land-of-milk-and-honey","tag-lovable-losers","tag-milk-and-honey","tag-pale-hose","tag-quality-history","tag-shoeless-joe-jackson","tag-soaking-in-the-sun","tag-visiting-chicago","tag-windy-city","tag-wrigley"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/301"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14522\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}