In 2006, a Baseball Hall of Fame Special Committee on Negro Leagues, made up primarily of expert blackball scholars, elected 17 Negro Leaguers to the Hall of Fame, almost doubling the total number of players and executives whose careers were primarily in the Negro Leagues from 18 to 35. If we use Sol White and Frank Grant as the \u2018beginning of scope\u2019 for blackball Hall of Fame consideration, that\u2019s 35 honorees (29 players and 6 executives) for roughly a fifty-year period of Negro Leagues play. This 2006 special election certainly was a defining moment, and something to be celebrated.<\/p>\n
However, since the 2006 election, no additional Negro League players have been honored, and other than Minnie Minoso, who would not fit the Hall of Fame\u2019s definition of \u201cprimarily a Negro Leaguer\u201d, there seems to be little momentum towards considering any further additions. But this is not the first time there have been interruptions or obstacles in the attempt to, in a small way, right some past wrongs and bring honor and attention to pre-integration blackball via the Hall of Fame. You might even say it\u2019s just another mountain to climb in the battle to get some recognition for those whose greatness remained anonymous for so long due to their skin color.<\/p>\n
The first induction year for the Baseball Hall of Fame was 1936. However, it wasn\u2019t until 1966, when Ted Williams in his induction speech said \u201cI hope someday Satchel Paige and Josh Gibson will be voted into the Hall of Fame as symbols of the great Negro players who are not here only because they weren’t given the chance\u201d that the Hall of Fame began to seriously consider honoring the Negro League veterans. The Hall of Fame is a separate institution from Major League Baseball and is not technically under the authority of the Commissioner of Baseball. Yet the Hall of Fame cannot be considered an equal partner with MLB either. MLB can exist without the Cooperstown Hall of Fame and Museum, but the Hall of Fame could not really exist without MLB, whose support sanctions and legitimatizes the Hall of Fame. William Eckert was the Commissioner of Baseball when Williams made his speech, but despite a growing number of sportswriters getting behind the idea of honoring Negro League players, little progress seemed to be happening until Bowie Kuhn became Commissioner in February of 1969.<\/p>\n
Also in 1969, the Baseball Writers\u2019 Association of America formed their own committee to push for Negro Leaguers to be included in the Hall of Fame. Then the book \u201cOnly the Ball was White\u201d came out in 1970, with author, Robert Peterson, arguing for specific players to be honored. Kuhn publicly said he supported inducting Negro League players. The Board of Directors of the Hall of Fame, however, seemed to have reservations about honoring the Negro Leaguers in exactly the same manner as MLB players. In February of 1971, after some negotiations between Kuhn, Paul Kerr, President of the Hall of Fame, and the HOF board of directors, the Hall of Fame created a 10-man special committee to select players based on the following criteria:<\/p>\n
1. The candidates shall be selected on the basis of their playing ability, sportsmanship, character and their contribution to the teams on which they played and to baseball in general.<\/p>\n
2. Only one man will be selected yearly and only one election will be held each year, preferably in the first week of February.<\/p>\n
3. The player must have had at least 10 years of experience in the Negro baseball leagues and must have performed prior to 1946.<\/p>\n
4. A player to be selected must receive 75 percent of the committee\u2019s vote.<\/p>\n
NOTE: The National Hall of Fame and Museum has the right to review the rules and regulations each year and exercises the right of approval. i<\/em><\/p>\n While certainly a step forward, there still was controversy about the plan. Joe Durso of the New York Times noted \u201cThe tablets honoring the black stars will be separate from the 117 that have been placed in the museum during the last 33 years\u2026\u201dii<\/em> Satchel Paige was quickly selected as the first honoree by the new committee, and a special dinner\/news conference for Paige was held on February 9th at the famous Toots Shore restaurant in New York for Kuhn to make the official announcement. \u201cHowever, some misgivings were expressed yesterday when Commissioner Bowie Kuhn announced Paige\u2019s election\u2026The misgivings were prompted by the fact that Paige and the other former stars, who will be picked at a rate of one a year, will occupy \u2018special\u2019 niches at Cooperstown.\u201d \u201cTechnically, you\u2019d have to say he\u2019s not in the Hall of Fame,\u201d Kuhn said in reply to persistent questioning in front of Paige and his wife\u2026.\u201dBut I\u2019ve often said the Hall of Fame isn\u2019t a building but a state of mind. The important thing is how the public views Satchel Paige, and I know how I view him.\u201diii<\/em><\/p>\n In the following days, several critical articles were written. Wells Trombly of The Sporting News wrote: \u201c\u2026Jim Crow still lives\u2026 So they will be set aside in a separate wing. Just as they were when they played. It is an outright farce. If the commissioner had any shame, he would suspend the rules. Had baseball truly been a pastime for all the nation from 1882 to 1947, those ancient and honorable black athletes would have made it to Cooperstown on their own, a fact Kuhn seems to have overlooked.”iv<\/em> Jim Murray of the Los Angeles Times detected this lingering racism and wrote, “They segregated the Hall of Fame! … To have kept Satchel Paige from playing in the white leagues for 24 years and then bar him from the pearly gates on the grounds he didn’t play the required 10 years [in the major leagues] is a shocking bit of insolent cynicism, a disservice to America. What is this \u2013 1840? Either let him in the front of the hall \u2013 or move the damn thing to Mississippi.”v<\/em><\/p>\n Black sportswriter A. S. (Doc) Young noted that, \u201cAs far as I\u2019m concerned, the overriding factor is this: The oldtime Negro league greats were ready, willing, able and anxious to play Organized Ball, but they were barred for reasons of race and color. The least they should receive now is full-fledged honors\u2026.It\u2019s salvation is in the spirit of good intentions, \u201c but he declared there should be a simultaneous, mass induction of all eligible oldtime Negro greats \u2013 or \u201cthis thing could drag on for fifty years.\u201dvi<\/em> Black sportswriter Wendell Smith added \u201cIt is quite possible this special category will be eliminated and Paige and other black players will be moved into the official Hall of Fame.\u201dvii<\/em> Paige himself played down the controversy, saying \u201cAs far as I am concerned, I\u2019m in the Hall of Fame. I don\u2019t know nothing about no Negro section. I\u2019m proud to be in it. Wherever they put me is alright with me.\u201dviii<\/em><\/p>\n It took until July 7th, only a month before the induction ceremony, but the Hall of Fame board of directors did change their minds and agree that all honorees of the Negro Leagues selection committee should have full membership in the Hall of Fame.ix<\/em> Later in his 1987 autobiography, Kuhn claimed he “knew that the furor would be heard by the board of directors and that the public outcry would be hard to resist. That is exactly what happened.”x <\/em><\/p>\n The following year, the rules were amended slightly so that selection was not just limited to one player, but to any players who received over 75% of the committee vote. However, it seems clear that the direction from the Hall of Fame was not for any \u201cmass induction\u201d of players as Doc Young had advocated, but simply permission to elect two players instead of just one. When the Hall of Fame originally started voting on inductees in 1936 and was faced with a backlog of players from the previous 60 years, 26 player and executives were elected by 1939. As former Negro League shortstop and committee member Bill Yancey had passed away the previous April, and no replacement was named, nominees had to receive 7 out of the 9 possible votes.xi<\/em> Josh Gibson and Buck Leonard were elected, with Gibson receiving all nine votes and Leonard receiving seven votes.<\/p>\n The trickle of players inducted continued for the next few years. Monte Irvin was elected in 1973, followed by Cool Papa Bell in 1974, Judy Johnson in 1975, and Oscar Charleston (finally?!) in 1976. In 1977, Pop Lloyd and Martin Dihigo were selected for induction. Then the Hall of Fame decided the work was done, and that the special committee should be disbanded. Sportswriter Red Smith wrote: \u201cIt was the last official act of the committee, which is being disbanded in the na\u00efve belief that when Dihigo and Lloyd were tapped\u2026the committee\u2019s job was finished\u2026So nine blacks have been named, and that\u2019s a full team, and baseball is tired of doing penance. When the committee has ceased to be, players like Richard (Cannonball) Redding, Rube Foster and Willie Wells will be out in the cold forever.\u201dxii<\/em> Robert Peterson wrote a letter to the New York Times editor stating \u201cI could easily name another dozen men who would do honor to the Hall of Fame\u201d and then went on to specifically urge at least adding Rube Foster as an executive.xiii<\/em> Red Smith commented that \u201c…by that time [induction ceremony day] the special committee on Negro leagues will have been dissolved, unless this injustice can be forestalled.<\/p>\n For the last six years this committee has been sending to the Hall of Fame players who would have qualified for Cooperstown if racial prejudice had not kept them out of organized ball.\u201dxiv<\/em> Negro Leagues expert John Holway wrote \u201c\u2026unless Commissioner Bowie Kuhn and the 14 other directors of the Baseball Hall of Fame save him at a special meeting next Sunday, baseball\u2019s shrine will shut its doors in Joe Williams\u2019s face, perhaps forever\u2026the committee voted to disband, saying no other candidates could get the 75 percent of its vote needed for election\u2026Kuhn denies the knowledge of a \u2018quota,\u2019 but his spokesman, Joe Reichler, concedes that the commissioner has been under pressure from those who want to end the black nominations.\u201dxv<\/em> Noting that there was not just controversy about the special committee on Negro leagues but also on the veterans committee, an induction day column by Michael Strauss said: \u201cLast night Kuhn, at a meeting of the Hall of Fame\u2019s board of directors, appointed a committee \u2018to review the situation and to suggest changes if it was deemed necessary\u201d.xvi<\/em><\/p>\n The review resulted in the end of the Negro leagues committee, which was combined into a new veterans committee instead. The new committee could only elect a maximum of two people overall and only one from each \u2018category\u2019: MLB player, Umpire, Executive, Manager, Negro League player. Out of the 18 committee members, only two \u2013 Roy Campanella and Kuhn assistant Joe Rechlier – were retained from the Negro leagues committee. \u201cThe politics of this thing were important,\u201d said one former member of the committee, who preferred not to be identified. \u201cAt first, they wanted a separate wing, then they felt we were going too fast in electing people. When we started, we drew up a list of 25 stars of the Negro Leagues who looked like sure things for the Hall of Fame. We got up to nine.<\/p>\n Then, rather than hassle it every year, we decided to disband.\u201dxvii<\/em> The first year with the new committee resulted in no Negro League players being elected for the first time since they were eligible. Under the new setup \u201c\u2026somebody\u2019s going to get the short end of the stick, and the committee needed only one meeting to realize that unless the rules were changed, the losers would be the blacks. They are an almost silent minority, and by comparison with the voluminous dossiers that the records provide on nearly everybody in organized ball, too little is known about their credentials. At least some members of the committee feel that the rules should allow them to consider the old black players separately and elect any who can get 14 votes.\u201dxviii <\/em><\/p>\n The 1979 and 1980 elections also passed with no new Negro League players being elected. In the spring of 1980, John Holway wrote: \u201cLast summer, at Willie Mays induction, 15 old time black stars petitioned Cooperstown\u2019s board of directors to liberalize the committee\u2019s voting. They asked that membership be evenly divided, with nine blacks and nine whites. They asked that, in view of the long delay in naming any black veterans, the quota of one-a-year be removed. The board rejected both requests.\u201d<\/p>\n In 1981 Rube Foster was elected in the category of Executive, but no Negro League players were elected. The 1982 election returned no Negro League players or executives for induction. The day before the 1982 Hall of Fame induction ceremony the New York Times noted: \u201cA petition with 742 signatures has been sent to the directors of baseball\u2019s Hall of Fame, asking that they ease regulations on the admission of \u2018old-timers\u2019 so that more men who starred in the Negro Leagues can be admitted to the Hall of Fame. And tomorrow, when Albert B. (Happy) Chandler is inducted into the Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, N.Y., he plans to speak out for that cause.\u201d \u201cBlack players get excluded not because of prejudice against these gentlemen but because of lack of knowledge of their accomplishments,\u201d said Phil Lowry of Detroit, a member of the Society for American Baseball Research. The petition to the Hall of Fame was written by Lowry and Nettie Stearnes, the widow of former Negro League star Turkey Stearnes.xix<\/em><\/p>\n The 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1986 Hall of Fame elections came and went, and no former Negro Leaguers were elected. In September 1984, Bowie Kuhn\u2019s time as Commissioner had ended. What had started out in the early years of his term as a promising beginning to honoring a classification of overlooked ball players had come to a halt. On induction day 1986 the New York Times published a letter to the editor from John Holway: \u201c\u2026for the seventh year in a row, there will be no veterans of the old Negro leagues receiving plaques on the dais.\u201d Holway gave several possible options to change the system, such as adding more blacks to the veterans committee, changing the quota from two overall to two white and two black candidates, or going back to the original separate Negro league committee concept. In his concluding remarks Holway said \u201cThe Hall of Fame election policy is the last bit of blatant racism left in baseball.\u201dxx<\/em><\/p>\n 1987 saw Ray Dandridge elected to the Hall of Fame. However, this turned out not to be a breakthrough, but an anomaly. From 1978, the first year the special Negro leagues committee was disbanded, through 1994, Dandridge was the only Negro leagues player elected. Finally in 1995, Leon Day was elected, which started a run of one Negro league player per year:<\/p>\n 1996 \u2013 Bill Foster<\/p>\n 1997 \u2013 Willie Wells<\/p>\n 1998 \u2013 Bullet Rogan<\/p>\n 1999 \u2013 Joe Williams<\/p>\n 2000 \u2013 Hilton Smith<\/p>\n Then the electing of Negro league players stopped again, at a total of 17 players and 1 executive elected. No one was elected from 2001 through 2005, which lead to the (new) Special Committee on Negro Leagues. That special election gave us the 17 additional members in 2006, and that\u2019s where we are today. Since Negro Leaguers became eligible in 1971, with all the stops, starts, and roadblocks discussed above, the longest the Hall of Fame has gone without electing someone connected to blackball has been the eight years between the election of Ray Dandridge in 1987 and the election of Leon Day in 1995. So here we are in 2019, and with no candidates seemingly under consideration, and the recent \u201cEarly Baseball\u201d Committee not meeting until 2020, we\u2019re looking at 2021 as the earliest a Negro leagues candidate will even be nominated.<\/p>\n This will be a precedent-setting fifteen-year gap. We\u2019ve seen in the past that whenever the Hall of Fame has seemingly been \u201cfinished\u201d electing Negro league stars, public pressure led by either newspapermen or by researchers like John Holway has served to finally get the ball rolling again. But with the more well-known, major stars already elected, will there be any impetus to get the process moving again? With no obviously overlooked candidate, how will support for more honorees be banded together? And if no Negro League candidate is nominated for 2021, the Early Baseball Committee is not scheduled to meet again for 10 years! Have we seen the last Negro league inductee into the Hall of Fame?<\/p>\n I think there is reason for at least a little optimism. One of the arguments against the Negro league players being inducted has always been the lack of statistics. With researchers like those in the SABR Negro Leagues Committee, many of whom are responsible for the data currently on baseball-reference.com, and those I work with at Seamheads.com, adding new data almost monthly, there\u2019s certain to be new light shed on the abilities of some additional overlooked players. Then there\u2019s the newer mediums on the internet, such as blogs and bulletin boards and Facebook and Twitter, where groups of like-minded fans and researchers can be formed and grow quickly, meaning less reliance on traditional newspaper sportswriters to get the public motivated and together for a common and just cause. In addition, there are still some overlooked candidates remaining, such as:<\/p>\n Nip Winters<\/a><\/p>\n Dick Lundy<\/a><\/p>\n John Beckwith<\/a><\/p>\n