{"id":395,"date":"2008-04-22T06:00:58","date_gmt":"2008-04-22T13:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/2008\/04\/22\/baseball-history-%e2%80%94-as-seen-from-the-shadows-of-cooperstown-part-vii\/"},"modified":"2008-10-06T19:10:20","modified_gmt":"2008-10-07T02:10:20","slug":"baseball-history-%e2%80%94-as-seen-from-the-shadows-of-cooperstown-part-vii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/2008\/04\/22\/baseball-history-%e2%80%94-as-seen-from-the-shadows-of-cooperstown-part-vii\/","title":{"rendered":"Baseball History \u00e2\u20ac\u201d As Seen From The Shadows of Cooperstown: Part VII"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the seventh of a 10-part series, the author takes an in-depth look at Major League Baseball history from 1961 to 1970.<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Introduction <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

William Mead called this decade The Explosive Sixties<\/span><\/em> in the book he edited for Redefinition in 1989. And I suppose it was. I entered the decade a teenager, and by its end I was long gone from <\/st1>Pittsburgh<\/st1>, with my college days behind me.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Baseball started to expand in the Sixties, and that brought not just new teams, but new stuff<\/span><\/em> to baseball: <\/st1>Houston<\/st1>\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Astrodome featured plastic grass called Astroturf, and although it was not organic, it spread like weeds. The new parks in Pittsburgh<\/st1> and St Louis<\/st1> and Philadelphia<\/st1> and <\/st1>Cincinnati<\/st1> went plastic, and they also looked a lot alike.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The saying goes, that if you remember the Sixties, you probably weren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t there (or something like that). <\/st1>America<\/st1> went through great changes, there were movements galore, with their own marches and protests and slogans. Causes fought for time on the evening news: Civil rights, women\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s lib, gay rights, animal rights, the environmentalists, and on and on, and perhaps none of the movements divided the country more painfully than those which supported the war in <\/st1>Vietnam<\/st1>, or which tried to end it. It was a time of gaps \u00e2\u20ac\u201d between generations, between left and right (that is, if you believed in politics at all), between minorities and majorities. Sometimes you wondered what was holding the country together, or if it would, if it could survive The Sixties.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Baseball was, I Think, what the author of the pop classic paperback Future Shock<\/span><\/em> (Alvin Toffler) called a Zone of Stability. It changed, but everything else seemed to be changing faster, and more out of control. Baseball experimented not just with plastic grass, and domes, but with new-fangled uniforms and all sorts of new colors. The players \u00e2\u20ac\u201d some of them \u00e2\u20ac\u201d fooled around with mustaches and sideburns, and some black players sported huge Afros that they struggled to stuff inside their hats and helmets. Jewelry appeared \u00e2\u20ac\u201d actually, I have no idea when the first earrings and necklaces showed up, but it seems like it was during the Sixties. I think the first hair-blowers arrived in locker rooms a bit later.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Baseball on the diamond was still Good Old Baseball. The long summers played on, despite the war, the marches, the protests. Players took stands, but if they couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t do their job, they were back in the minors or cut loose. Baseball stood its ground, and the sports page was a welcome refuge from the rest of the newspaper. It was a wild decade, it seemed like everything that survived, changed, even if it didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t want to. Even baseball.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1961 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

There is no reason to call this season the Year of the Asterisk. Roger Maris went out and hit 61 home runs. No one expected that \u00e2\u20ac\u201d if anyone was expected<\/span><\/em> to hit 61 someday, it was Mickey Mantle. He had 53 by September 10, but was hurting physically, and hit just one more down the stretch. Maris hit ten in those last weeks, breaking Ruth\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s 1927 record of 60. The duel between Maris & Mantle \u00e2\u20ac\u201d the M & M Boys \u00e2\u20ac\u201d dominated the sports pages so that even a NL fan like myself had<\/span><\/em> to notice.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the Pirates lost their ace Vern Law to injury and slid to 6th place. <\/st1>Cincinnati<\/st1> got some pitching (O\u00e2\u20ac\u2122Toole, Jay and Purkey) to go with a great offense, and won the NL pennant by 4 over the Dodgers. Vada Pinson hit .343 in his 3rd full season, and why he is not in Cooperstown<\/st1>? Over in the AL<\/st1>, the Yankees won 109 to finish 8 ahead of Detroit<\/st1> (whose Norm Cash batted .361, with 41 HRs), and 47.5 ahead of <\/st1>Kansas City<\/st1>. KC had traded Roger Maris to the Yanks. KC hit 90 HRs in 1961, and none of their outfielders were in double digits. See The Kansas City A\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s and the Wrong Half of the Yankees<\/span><\/em> by Jeff Katz.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Come October, it felt like the Yankees were out to avenge the previous year\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s loss to the Pirates, a loss that some think cost Casey Stengel his job as manager. Joey Jay \u00e2\u20ac\u201d the first to make the majors after playing Little League \u00e2\u20ac\u201d won Game Two, 6-2, but the rest of the Series was all Yankees: 2-0, 3-2, 7-0, 13-5. This team smashed 240 HRs in the regular season, which was 162 games, but still<\/span><\/em>.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

What made Maris\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 61 controversial was, of course, those extra eight games, tacked on because the AL added two new teams. The Senators moved to Minnesota and became the Twins, and a new franchise started up in D.C. Another new team was planted in L.A., the Angels, and they won 70 games.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1962 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Now it was the NL\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s turn to expand to ten teams and 162 games. I already mention Houston and the Astrodome. The other team was the Mets, a team that became a darling of the media. They won just 40 games. Not the worst team ever: the Cleveland Spiders went 20-134 in 1899, the Boston Braves 38-115 in 1935. But close enough. The Spiders finished twelfth, the Mets tenth. Casey Stengel, who spoke baseball like no one else, helped endear this team as \u00e2\u20ac\u0153loveable losers\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to the NY media, and Mets fans made the best out of a terrible situation. Hey, at least there was a NL team back in the Apple.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

My Pirates rose to 4th, but finished ten back of San Francisco \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and Los Angeles. The two coast teams played 165 games that summer, the Giants winning the best-of-three playoff. SF had its own M & M Boys, Mays and McCovey. I think everyone was jealous of the Giants farm system. It produced Orlando Cepeda and Felipe Alou and Willie Kirkland in 1958, Matty Alou in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc61, and there were more Alous on their way. Willie McCovey arrived with a bang in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc59, batting .354 and 27 extra base hits in less than 200 AB. And if all that offense wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t scary enough \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and remember, Willie Mays was still potent, 49 HRs in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc62 \u00e2\u20ac\u201d the Giants also came up with Juan Marichal.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

To get into the Series, the Giants had to get past the Dodgers. Sandy Koufax was not quite the superstar he would bloom into, for the rest of his shortened career. He got KO\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d in Game One, which the Giants took, 8-0. Don Drysdale was<\/span><\/em> in peak form, 25 wins, and he started Game Two. Down 5-0, the Dodgers rallied for 7 in the sixth, and won 8-7 with speedster Maury Wills coming home in the bottom of the 9th on a sac fly. The Game Three start went to Juan Marichal and Johnny Podres, but the outcome hinged on relievers. Up 4-2, the Dodgers Ed Roebuck put out a fire in the Giant 6th (bases loaded, none out), but ignited one himself in the top of the ninth, as the Giants strung together a couple hits, four walks, an error, and a little of everything else to score four runs and win, 6-4.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The Yankees took the AL flag by five over Minnesota (!), but the big surprise was the expansion Angels\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 third-place finish. New teams were not supposed to win 86 games. After that exciting playoff, the Giants took the Yankees to seven games in the Series, and the image that lingers has Game Seven on the line, the Yanks up 1-0 with Ralph Terry on the mound. Terry had given up Mazeroski\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s HR two years and three days earlier, and now he faced Willie McCovey with two out and two on in the bottom of the ninth. McCovey lined the ball hard but right at 2B Bobby Richardson. Charles Schultz\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 cartoon said it all. For three panels, Charlie Brown sits silently on the curb. In the last panel, he shouts to the heavens: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Why couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t McCovey\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s hit have been two feet higher?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Damn Yankees<\/span><\/em>, one more time.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1963 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Up top, I described the Sixties as a tumultuous decade. But it didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t start that way. John Kennedy was elected president in 1960, succeeding Ike, the hero of WW II. Kennedy\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s years were not really Camelot<\/span><\/em>, but you could pretend. Kennedy had Americans out walking and hiking, and joining the new Peace Corps. He was also getting us stuck in Vietnam, but nobody much noticed that till later. The Sixties began unraveling when Kennedy was assassinated in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc63, and I think hit its low point five years later when Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King were both killed by bullets, and Richard Nixon entered the White House. All of that was in the future, when the 1963 season was played.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The Yankees won again, ho-hum, three straight for Ralph Houk, with Al Lopez\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 Sox finishing ten back. 1B Joe Pepitone hit 27 HRs, Tom Tresh 25, with Mantle\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s legs giving out. Whitey Ford (24-7) was assisted by Jim Bouton (21-7). The Dodgers still had Drysdale and Podres and now Koufax (25-5, 1.88) was in high gear. They won with speed, pitching and defense, with giant Frank Howard the only real slugger. They finished six ahead of the St Louis Cardinals, who were, it turned out, just one trade away from becoming a mini-dynasty.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The Dodgers\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 sweep of the mighty Yankees was stunning. The Yankees hardly ever lost in October, and they never<\/span><\/em> went quietly. But Koufax won 5-2 and 2-1, Drysdale tossed a 1-0 shutout, and the old hero of \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc55, Johnny Podres turned in a 4-1 win. The Los Angeles staff had a sparkling ERA of 1.00. The NL had now thrown four different teams up against the Yankees in four Octobers, and on deck was yet another different league champion.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1964 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

I graduated from high school in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc64, and left Pittsburgh, never to live there again. Yet I remain a Pittsburgher, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s where I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m from. When I visit, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s still like going home.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The book I recommend for this season is David Halberstam\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s October 1964<\/span><\/em>, which I reviewed long ago, and I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll add that review below.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

In \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc64, the Yankees won again, but by a whisker. Al Lopez\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 Sox finished one back, Hank Bauer\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Orioles two behind Yogi Berra\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s<\/span><\/em> pinstripers. That sweep by the Dodgers caused Ralph Houk to be \u00e2\u20ac\u0153kicked upstairs\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (he remained a Yankee VP for a while).
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Over in the NL, it looked<\/span><\/em> like the latest team to take a swing at the Yanks in October would be the Phillies. But they ran out of pitching and blew a big lead down the stretch, enabling the St Louis Cardinals to pass them on the final day, and the Cincinnati Reds to tie for second. The Giants were just three back.
\nThat set up a Cards-Yanks Series. The Cards put together a tough team, adding Lou Brock to their OF in a trade for Ernie Broglio. Brock had not done much with the Cubs, but hit .348 for the Cards after the trade, and then terrorized the basepaths for the next decade. Broglio had been a St Louis ace, but never showed that form as a Cub. One of those trades.<\/span><\/em>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The Cards took the Series in seven, with Bob Gibson winning two, including Game Seven, 7-5. Gibson was pitching on two days rest, following a 10-inning CG win in Game Five. See Halberstam\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s book, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a great story.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1965 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

How that Cardinal team sank to seventh place the next year is a puzzlement; I guess the pitching just wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t there, except for Gibson. The Dodgers rose from 6th to take the \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc65 NL pennant, two ahead of the Giants. As I look at the rosters of the NL teams in the Sixties, it is easy to believe that they all seemed to have a shot. The league was loaded with talent.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The Yankees hired the manager who beat them last October, Johnny Keane, and then dropped to sixth, 8 under .500. The next year, the Yanks would finish tenth<\/span><\/em>. These were, unfortunately, my college days, and I was not following baseball as closely anymore. Too bad; that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the way the dynasty crumbles.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Minnesota won 102 and finished 7 up on Chicago, 8 on Baltimore. Tony Oliva won a batting crown, and Harmon Killebrew got to play in his first and only Series.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

It was another seven-gamer, with the Dodgers taking the thing, Sandy Koufax on the hill at the end, finishing a 2-0, 3-hit, 10-K shutout. Sandy had lost Game Two, but came back to win Game Five, 7-0, fanning ten. I remember watching this Series out of the corners of my eyes \u00e2\u20ac\u201d I liked Mudcat Grant and Jim Kaat, while I only admired Drysdale and Koufax.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1966 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

My Pirates ended up in the \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc66 pennant race, along with the Dodgers and Giants, and once again NL fans were treated to a chase right down to the wire. My best memory of this race was using a crystal set to get late scores, that September. When the Dodgers won at the end, by two over SF and three over Pittsburgh, I felt bad that I couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t have rooted harder myself.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The Baltimore Orioles romped home by nine over the Twins. They had traded Milt Pappas, a solid starter, to Cincinnati for Frank Robinson. F-Robbie (not to be confused with Brooks Robinson) promptly turned in a Triple Crown season (.316-49-122), and made the O\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a team with which to be reckoned for a long time.
\nNow this<\/span><\/em> World Series, I remember pretty clearly. In Game One, Moe Drabowski (another former NLer) tossed 6.2 innings in long relief, fanning 11, in a 5-2 Oriole win. Then Jim Palmer followed with a shutout, 6-0; Wally Bunker did, too, 1-0, and Dave McNally made it three straight, 1-0 again. Robinson\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s HR off Drysdale sealed the last game. Paul Blair HR\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d in Game Three.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

My memory has me rooting against the Dodgers in both \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc65 and \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc66, which surprises me. I was, after all, a NL fan. Maybe it was just because the Yankees weren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t playing. Again, I admired<\/span><\/em> these Dodger teams, but I just couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t root for them.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1967 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

I remember the 1967 Series pretty well, too, and I think this October is responsible for my lasting conviction that if I ever get to manage a team in Heaven, and I get into a Series and there is a Game Seven to win, I want Bob Gibson on the mound.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The Cards jumped from sixth place to the pennant in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc67, breezing home by 10.5 over the Giants. They now had Orlando Cepeda and Roger Maris in their lineup. Dick Williams brought the Boston Red Sox home in the AL, with Detroit and Minnesota just one game behind. The Sox had Yaz, Boomer Scott, Rico Petrocelli, and 22-year-old Tony Conigiaro, a slugger who suffered a broken cheekbone HBP in August, and missed the Series. The Yankees finished ninth, ahead of KC.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Bob Gibson had won just 13 (in 24 games) during the season, but he tossed three CG victories in October, winning by 2-1, 6-0, and 7-2 in Gave Seven. He gave up three earned runs in his 27 innings, and fanned 26. When a Gibson or a Koufax or (later) a Nolan Ryan was pitching, there was always a sub-plot to the games, how many K\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s<\/span><\/em>? In that Game Seven, the Sox started Jim Lonborg, who had shutout the Cards 5-0 in Game Two, and held them to three hits and one run in Game Five. It shaped up as a great duel, but the Cards got to Lonborg, and Gibson hit a HR for good measure.
\nThis was the kind of post-season fans relished: two very good and well-armed teams, going at each other for seven days i October, no days off, the Series ending on October 7.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1968 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

If you were there in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc68, you remember it as The Year of the Pitcher. The mound was raised, just enough to give hurlers an edge. So that<\/span><\/em> summer, NL fans followed Bob Gibson as he tossed shutout after shutout, 13 in all, and turned in a sparkling 1.12 ERA, winning 22 and leading St Louis to a repeat pennant, by 9 over the Giants. Juan Marichal won 26. What is amazin\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 as I look at the stats for \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc68, is how the Mets, with Seaver (16-12, 2.20), Koosman (19-12, 2.08), and a team ERA of 2.72, finished ninth<\/span><\/em>. Well, they hit just .228, that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s how. The league ERA was 2.99, down 39 points from \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc67.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

In the AL, all eyes were on Detroit\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Denny McLain, who ended up with 31 wins and a 1.96 ERA. The AL league ERA was 2.98, down 25 points, and if it wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t for Carl Yastrzemski\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s .301, the league would not have had anyone close to .300 \u00e2\u20ac\u201d it was that tough for batters. The Tigers romped home by 12 over the Orioles.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The country staggered through the summer of 1968, with the war in Vietnam never out of mind, the assassinations of RFK and MLK unsettling things even more, and finally the eruption of violent rioting across the country in most of the largest cities. When I think of the Sixties, the Summer of 1968 comes to my mind first. Everything was happening. Even some baseball.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Even today, when I think back to the World Series of \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc68, I find it hard to believe that the Tigers won. In Game One, it was Gibson vs McLain, as sweet a duel as Three Finger Brown against Matty, or Chief Bender against Walter Johnson. Gibson whiffed 17 Tigers and won, 4-0. But the Tigers came back the next day, 8-1, behind \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Fat Mickey\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Lolich, a burly southpaw whose 17-9 season was eclipsed by McLain\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s 31.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

The Cards took the first two in Detroit, 7-3 and then 10-1 as Gibson fanned 10 and won his seventh straight Series game. But Lolich came back to win Game Five, 5-3, and the Tigers roared home 13-1 in Game Six \u00e2\u20ac\u201d setting up a wonderful Game Seven. McLain had departed early in the 10-1 Game Four loss, then tossed the CG win in Game Six. So Mickey Lolich took the hill to face off with Gibson in the finale. Which went to the Tigers, 4-1.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Both pitchers were tossing shutouts into the 7th, when with two outs, the Tigers pushed across three runs on four hits \u00e2\u20ac\u201d one of them a misplayed fly that went for a triple; but CF Curt Flood would go down in baseball history for something else. The inning before, Lolich picked off Lou Brock and Flood. Lolich would yield just five hits in his nine, Gibson eight; Gibby\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s 8 K gave him 35 for October. But no joy in St Louis, Fat Mickey\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s three wins put the Tigers on top. Another seven-day non-stop joy ride for fans.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1969 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

More expansion: San Diego and Montreal in the NL, Kansas City and Seattle in the AL. And something new: now both leagues were split into divisions<\/span><\/em>, six teams in each. This meant playoffs<\/span><\/em>, another round of games in the post-season. Maybe the best thing about these changes was some fans would be spared the embarrassment of having their team finish twelfth<\/span><\/em> \u00e2\u20ac\u201d tenth was bad enough. Maybe the worst thing was that a terrific team could have a terrific season, win their division in a runaway race, but get knocked off in a best-of-five and not make it to the World Series. The latter became my biggest problem with the new setup, as my team won its division with some regularity in the 1970s, but only got into the Series twice. Eventually, when the East and West playoffs were best-of-seven, I learned to like the extra post-season games. I still hate best-of-fives.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

There were still problems in America in 1969, Vietnam, race, all the liberation movements, long hair<\/span><\/em>, of all things, still made for tense times. But then there was Woodstock, and we put a man on the moon, and to cap it all, the Mets won a pennant. The<\/span><\/em> book on 1969 is Ball Four<\/span><\/em>, by Jim Bouton, and I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll add below my review.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

For a while, it looked like \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc69 would be the Year of the Cubs. Leo Durocher had them on a collision course with October, behind Banks and Billy Williams and Ron Santo, who smacked 29 that summer and drove home 123. But the Cubs faded, and the Amazin\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 Mets of Gil Hodges charged past them to take the flag \u00e2\u20ac\u201d well, half a flag \u00e2\u20ac\u201d by 8. Tom Seaver won 25, Koosman 17, and while the lineup had few stars and no future Hall of Famers, the \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc69 Mets nevertheless are one of baseball\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s most storied teams.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

They would take on Atlanta, in the first \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Division Series\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (a phrase, like LCS, that I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve never liked, I use \u00e2\u20ac\u0153playoff\u00e2\u20ac\u009d), and defeated them handily in three straight. We think pitching determines a short series, but the scores were 9-5, 11-6, and 7-4. Three and out, as they say.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Over in the AL, Earl Weaver\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Orioles won 109 to finish well ahead of Detroit in the East, while Billy Martin\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Twins took the west by 9 over Oakland. The Oakland A\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s were the old KC Athletics, moved west by Charlie O. Finley. KC got an expansion team. The Orioles dispatched the Twins in three, 4-3, 1-0 (Dave McNally a 3-hit, 11-inning shutout CG), and 11-2. With both of the playoffs ending 3-0, I think fans felt better about them, since no team had ever won four straight in October up to that time. Baltimore was starting a three-year run in the Series; the Mets, after finishing ninth or tenth so often in the Sixties, were no dynasty, but they were on a roll.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Upstate New York, the past thirty-some years, has swung back and forth between the Mets and Yankees, with some die-hard Red Sox fans in the mix. So I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve been over-exposed to all the highlights of the \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc69 Series, won by the Mets in five games. It was certainly memorable, but not as dramatic as it has grown to be since. Mike Cuellar out-dueled Seaver in the opener, then the Mets\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 magic took over: Koosman over McNally, 2-1; Gary Gentry a shutout over Palmer, 5-0; Seaver 2-1 over Cuellar in the rematch; then Koosman, the CG in the 5-3 finale. Circus catches by Agee and Swoboda, ex-Buc Donn Clendenon\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s three homers, another nicked shoe providing a turning point, Nolan Ryan picking up a save \u00e2\u20ac\u201d New York is still celebrating, cheering not<\/span><\/em> for the Yankees.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1970 <\/span><\/u><\/strong>
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Maybe the decade seemed long because it was my first full<\/span><\/em> decade as a fan. In any case, as a Pittsburgh<\/span><\/em> fan I mourned the loss of Forbes Field, but accepted the new park, Three Rivers, and who couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t like a park that was home to a winning team? The Pirates finished five ahead of the Cubs. In the playoffs, they would face the Cincinnati Reds, and these two teams \u00e2\u20ac\u201d the Lumber Company (lite on pitching) and The Big Red Machine \u00e2\u20ac\u201d were just a treat to watch for the next<\/span><\/em> decade. In 1970, the Reds won 102 and ran away with the NL West. Why they were west<\/span><\/em> while St Louis was east<\/span><\/em> was a mystery \u00e2\u20ac\u201d but in the 70s, it worked out fine.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

Baltimore won again in the AL East (15 up on the Yanks), and the Twins won again in the West, and \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc70 resembled \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc69 another way, both playoffs again were three and out.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

1970 is when I really started hating best-of-five, altho this peaked in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc72. The three games the Pirates lost seemed to be terrible mistakes. Three times, Pirates pitching held the Reds to three runs a game \u00e2\u20ac\u201d but the Reds\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 pitchers did better, holding the Bucs to three runs for the mini-series. Game One went ten innings, 3-0; Game Two, 3-1; Game Three, 3-2. Oh well, wait\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll next year.<\/span><\/em>
\nIn the Series, the Big Red Machine was stopped by the O\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s in five. I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t remember much about this Series \u00e2\u20ac\u201d I must have been in mourning, or denial. Palmer, Cuellar, McNally \u00e2\u20ac\u201d too much. The O\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s took the first three, then the Reds avoided a sweep with a come-from-behind, 6-5 road win. But it was the Orioles time.
\n<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n

So went the Sixties. It seemed nothing like the Fifties, and neither did the country, but we all muddled through. I had moved to Cleveland in \u00e2\u20ac\u02dc68, after college, but remained a Pirate fan, in exile. In seven years, I attended just one Indian game \u00e2\u20ac\u201d it was on a frigid April night, an extra-inning game won by the visitors on a run walked home. That seemed about right.<\/span><\/p>\n

The above is an excerpt from Issue #443 of Gene’s Notes From the Shadows of Cooperstown. To read the rest of the issue (or past issues), click here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/o><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the seventh of a 10-part series, the author takes an in-depth look at Major League Baseball history from 1961 to 1970.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notes-from-the-shadows-of-cooperstown"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}