{"id":894,"date":"2008-12-30T16:39:57","date_gmt":"2008-12-30T23:39:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/2008\/12\/30\/the-curious-case-of-zoilo-versalles\/"},"modified":"2008-12-30T17:29:27","modified_gmt":"2008-12-31T00:29:27","slug":"the-curious-case-of-zoilo-versalles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/2008\/12\/30\/the-curious-case-of-zoilo-versalles\/","title":{"rendered":"The Curious Case of Zoilo Versalles"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more-->I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve been thinking about Jack Morris lately. That probably means that the Hall of Fame elections have just happened, or else they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re coming up. I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t have a strong opinion one way or the other about Morris going into Cooperstown; I put him in a class with Jim Rice, Alan Trammell, Bruce Sutter and Bill Mazeroski\u00e2\u20ac\u201dhe wouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t be out of place, but he wouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t be the class of the joint either. Despite being a Twins fan, I probably wouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t vote for him. The reason he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s on my mind, though, is because he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a prime example of a syndrome that seems to be on the rise among baseball folks.<\/p>\n<p>To wit: the discussions about Jack Morris and the HOF, and goodness knows there have been a handful, tend to revolve around <em>what he was<\/em>, as opposed to <em>what he did<\/em>. Jack Morris was a big game pitcher. Jack Morris was the dominant pitcher of the 1980s (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.bb-ref.com\/pi\/shareit\/Vk5M\">not true<\/a>). Then, when people <em>do <\/em>talk about what he did, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s always in the context of labeling him as one thing or another. No, he wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t a big game pitcher\u00e2\u20ac\u201dlook at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.baseball-reference.com\/boxes\/TOR\/TOR199210220.shtml\">1992 World Series<\/a>. That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s what I just did, too, by linking to convenient statistics. The point, though, is that the arguments are always about labels, not players. The more labels a player can accumulate, the more appealing he becomes as a Hall of Famer. Which, of course, is the most prestigious label of all.<\/p>\n<p>As an example, take two Hall of Fame shortstops, Cal Ripken Jr. and Robin Yount. Both were first-ballot choices, and both appear on each other\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s baseball-reference comps list, yet Yount has often been unjustly attacked as a weak member of the Hall, while Ripken came <a href=\"http:\/\/boston.redsox.mlb.com\/news\/article.jsp?ymd=20070109&amp;content_id=1775441&amp;vkey=news_mlb&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=mlb\">as close to unanimous selection<\/a> as anyone ever has. Why doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t Yount get the same respect? Partly because he lacks Ripken\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s labels. He\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not the Ironman, not the first modern power-hitting shortstop, not recognized in the same way as an ambassador of the game or a role model for children. That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not to denigrate his record\u00e2\u20ac\u201dno one would do that\u00e2\u20ac\u201dit\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s just that somehow, his achievements have not translated into labels as well as Ripken\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s have.<\/p>\n<p>Now, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not really true to call that a new phenomenon. Imprecise labeling has been around since <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tetragrammaton\">YHWH<\/a>, at the least. The problem comes when the actual historic record is obscured by the words people write about them. In Morris\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 case, that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the strikeouts, the innings pitched, the team wins and losses. As others have noted, debates about marginal Hall of Famers often end up as impromptu roasts. No one would seriously argue that Morris, Dale Murphy or Dick Allen were any less than outstanding players, but you could be forgiven for drawing that conclusion from reading some of the vitriol about their Hall qualifications.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, this problem is not exclusively a Hall of Fame one, and that brings us to Zoilo Versalles, who is one of the more over-labeled, under-appreciated players around. Zorro, as the good people at Topps called him on his <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.squeezeplaycards.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/zorro-versalles.jpg\">1961 baseball card<\/a>, is best known as the 1965 American League MVP. As Bill James has pointed out, this concurrently makes him the league MVP with the lowest Win Share total (32) in history. A great deal has been made about the injustice of Versalles winning the award over Twins teammate Tony Oliva. Compare their lines from that season:<\/p>\n<table border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"100%\">\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"59\"><strong> <\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"47\"><strong>PA<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"47\"><strong>H<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"47\"><strong>HR<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"42\"><strong>RBI<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"53\"><strong>K\/BB<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"52\"><strong>SB\/CS<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"49\"><strong>OBP<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"48\"><strong>SLG<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"59\">Versalles<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"47\">728<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"47\">182<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"47\">19<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"42\">77<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"53\">122\/41<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"52\">27\/5<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"49\">.319<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"48\">.462<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"59\">Oliva<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"47\">647<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"47\">185<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"47\">16<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"42\">98<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"53\">64\/55<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"52\">19\/9<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"49\">.378<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"48\">.491<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>Versalles led the league in extra base hits, total bases, runs and plate appearances. He had a great year. To a 2008 observer, though, Oliva had a demonstrably better season. Unfortunately, the statistics that show it\u00e2\u20ac\u201don-base, slugging, K\/BB ratio, Win Shares\u00e2\u20ac\u201dwere either not yet invented or not yet in vogue in 1965. Oliva\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s OPS+ of 141 was substantially higher than Zoilo\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s 115, but not has high as Harmon Killebrew\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s 145. Other Twins to top Versalles in OPS+ were Earl Battey, Don Mincher, Bob Allison and Jimmie Hall. He won a Gold Glove, yet had a below-average Range Factor per nine innings.<\/p>\n<p>The upshot of all this discussion, which is by no means original, is that Versalles, rather than being labeled as an MVP, is more often labeled as an MVP mistake, much like George Bell and <a href=\"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/2008\/12\/08\/the-joe-gordon-fan-club\/\">Joe Gordon<\/a>. This is a doubly distracting dose of hype, and it ends up serving a few different purposes. First, it makes <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hardballtimes.com\/main\/article\/of-fades-and-flops-and-zoilo\/\">Zoilo\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s subsequent decline<\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u201dhe never had another year with an OPS+ of 85\u00e2\u20ac\u201d seem much less dramatic. That is, if he was a \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcbad MVP\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 in the first place, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not as big a deal for him to fall off a cliff in subsequent years. That isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t true\u00e2\u20ac\u201dhis fall was truly disasterous for the Twins, regardless of whether he \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcshould\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 have won the MVP. A healthy Versalles, with Minnesota\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s other young veteran talent, could have altered the American League landscape in the late 1960s.<\/p>\n<p>Second, it muddies the question of the key to the Twins\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 success in 1965. Were they really a run-and-gun reincarnation of the 1959 White Sox, or was the pennant more thanks to the superb seasons by Oliva and Killebrew? That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a question that deserves closer scrutiny, and I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll try to get around to it shortly.<\/p>\n<p>Another label under which Versalles labored was a common one in the 1960s and 1970s\u00e2\u20ac\u201dthe show-boating, insubstantial, hyper-sensitive Hispanic. That stereotype was most famously applied to Roberto Clemente, but others were frequently painted with the same brush. According to a <em>Sports Illustrated<\/em> article from October 4, 1965, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Zoilo leads the league in runs scored, is second in hits, first in doubles, second in triples, third in stolen bases, and far ahead of the pack in brooding.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Versalles later attributed much of his behavior to language problems, insecurity, and homesickness, but the knock stayed with him throughout his career, for better or for worse. That in turn led the media towards other common Hispanic stereotypes\u00e2\u20ac\u201dflashy defender, reckless on the basepaths\u00e2\u20ac\u201dand before his career had hardly begun, his true record disappeared under a mountain of conjecture.<\/p>\n<p>Versalles isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t the only player to struggle under others\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 nomenclatural fancies; far from it. Of crafty left-handers, good-field no-hit middle infielders, LOOGYs and Three True Outcomers, there will never be a shortage.  One can only hope that these stock villains, straight from central casting, will at least be accompanied by enough greasy-haired, basement-dwelling stat geeks (oops) to extract some reality from perception.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":40,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-894","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/894","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/40"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=894"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/894\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=894"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=894"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=894"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}