{"id":9759,"date":"2010-11-30T14:50:50","date_gmt":"2010-11-30T21:50:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.seamheads.com\/?p=9759"},"modified":"2011-08-31T18:45:56","modified_gmt":"2011-09-01T01:45:56","slug":"the-favorite-toy-and-babe-ruth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seamheads.com\/blog\/2010\/11\/30\/the-favorite-toy-and-babe-ruth\/","title":{"rendered":"The Favorite Toy and…Babe Ruth"},"content":{"rendered":"

With the 2011 season still a few months away, I thought it was too early to bust out The Favorite Toy<\/a> to determine what milestones we might see next year, so I thought I’d go retro and look at some of the game’s greats, not-so-greats and what-might-have-beens to see what odds The Favorite Toy gave them for success. Who better to start with than the greatest hitter of all time, Babe Ruth? (Ted Williams’ head is so pissed right now it’s starting to thaw).<\/p>\n

The Bambino posted ridiculous numbers and still boasts the highest slugging percentage, OPS and OPS+ in baseball history, not to mention that he belted a staggering 714 home runs, more than twice the number of roundtrippers Lou Gehrig had (353) at the time of Ruth’s last game on May 30, 1935. By the end of the ’35 season, among runners-up, only Gehrig, Jimmie Foxx and Rogers Hornsby had as many as 300.<\/p>\n

So what was the likelihood of Ruth reaching 714? Actually much better than I expected. Starting with his first full batting season in 1919 and going through 1921 when the 26-year-old blasted 59 four-baggers, Ruth was expected to hit exactly 500 with an 11% chance of hitting 714 and a 1% shot at 832. Believe it or not, it gets even more impressive from there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Seasons (age)
\n<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n		3-YR AVG<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\nTo Date<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\nProj. Car.<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n500<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n600<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n700<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n714<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n800<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\nMAX (1%)
\n<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1919-1921 (26)<\/td>\n42.3<\/td>\n162<\/td>\n500<\/td>\n50%<\/td>\n27%<\/td>\n13%<\/td>\n11%<\/td>\n3%<\/td>\n832<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1920-1922 (27)<\/td>\n52.5<\/td>\n197<\/td>\n590<\/td>\n80%<\/td>\n48%<\/td>\n28%<\/td>\n26%<\/td>\n15%<\/td>\n976<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1921-1923 (28)<\/td>\n48.0<\/td>\n238<\/td>\n574<\/td>\n78%<\/td>\n43%<\/td>\n23%<\/td>\n21%<\/td>\n10%<\/td>\n903<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1922-1924 (29)<\/td>\n38.8<\/td>\n284<\/td>\n536<\/td>\n67%<\/td>\n30%<\/td>\n11%<\/td>\n9%<\/td>\n0%<\/td>\n783<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1923-1925 (30)<\/td>\n40.0<\/td>\n309<\/td>\n549<\/td>\n76%<\/td>\n32%<\/td>\n11%<\/td>\n9%<\/td>\n0%<\/td>\n784<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1924-1926 (31)<\/td>\n39.2<\/td>\n356<\/td>\n571<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n38%<\/td>\n13%<\/td>\n10%<\/td>\n0%<\/td>\n782<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1925-1927 (32)<\/td>\n38.2<\/td>\n416<\/td>\n606<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n54%<\/td>\n17%<\/td>\n14%<\/td>\n0%<\/td>\n793<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1926-1928 (33)<\/td>\n52.5<\/td>\n470<\/td>\n706<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n53%<\/td>\n47%<\/td>\n22%<\/td>\n937<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1927-1929 (34)<\/td>\n55.7<\/td>\n516<\/td>\n738<\/td>\nX<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n71%<\/td>\n62%<\/td>\n28%<\/td>\n956<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1928-1930 (35)<\/td>\n50.5<\/td>\n565<\/td>\n741<\/td>\nX<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n81%<\/td>\n69%<\/td>\n25%<\/td>\n916<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1929-1931 (36)<\/td>\n47.0<\/td>\n611<\/td>\n752<\/td>\nX<\/td>\nX<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n87%<\/td>\n25%<\/td>\n890<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1930-1932 (37)<\/td>\n46.7<\/td>\n652<\/td>\n727<\/td>\nX<\/td>\nX<\/td>\n81%<\/td>\n63%<\/td>\n12%<\/td>\n842<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1931-1933 (38)<\/td>\n42.3<\/td>\n686<\/td>\n770<\/td>\nX<\/td>\nX<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n24%<\/td>\n853<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1932-1934 (39)<\/td>\n35.5<\/td>\n708<\/td>\n761<\/td>\nX<\/td>\nX<\/td>\nX<\/td>\n97%<\/td>\n8%<\/td>\n813<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1933-1935 (40)<\/td>\n25.5<\/td>\n714<\/td>\n752<\/td>\nX<\/td>\nX<\/td>\nX<\/td>\nX<\/td>\n0%<\/td>\n789<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

At the upper end of the spectrum, Ruth had two peaks—one at 27, following his 1922 season, and one at 34, following his 1929 season. Neither is surprising, considering he had his two best home run totals in 1920 and 1921, before bettering or matching them in 1927 and 1928. At only 27 in 1922, Ruth was expected to hit 590 homers with a 1% chance of belting a Bugs Bunny-like 976, but the odds and expectancies dropped from there, most likely because of his 1925 season, which was cut short by an intestinal abscess that was dubbed “The bellyache heard ’round the world,” and required surgery. Ruth’s 1925 campaign didn’t begin until June 1 and he appeared in only 98 games, hitting 25 homers, his lowest total since 1918 when he belted 11.<\/p>\n

He rebounded in 1926 with 47 to win his seventh home run title in nine years, set a new record with 60 in 1927, then followed that up with 54, tying his 1920 mark and winning his ninth home run title in 11 years and third in a row. After 1928, The Favorite Toy projected his career total at 706, only eight shy of his actual total. He hit another 46 in 1929, so it’s no wonder TFT gave him a 28% chance at 800 homers heading into the 1930 season and a slim chance at 956. As late as 1931, at the age of 36, Ruth still had a 1-in-4 chance of reaching the 800 mark, and a slim possibility of hitting almost 900. He enjoyed his last great season in 1932 and was still well above average over his last three years, which had The Favorite Toy projecting 752 career homers for the Babe, but Ruth hit only six in 1935 before calling it quits with 714.<\/p>\n

It’s also amazing that TFT gave Ruth an 8% chance at 800 even as he was turning 40, something I don’t expect to see again until I crunch the numbers for the behemoths who played during the “Steroid Era.”<\/p>\n

On Deck: The Favorite Toy and…Ted Williams<\/p>\n

Mike Lynch is the author of <\/em>Harry Frazee, Ban Johnson and the Feud That Nearly Destroyed the American League<\/a><\/em> and It Ain’t So: A Might-Have-Been History of the White Sox in 1919 and Beyond<\/em><\/a>, and the founder of Seamheads.com.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With the 2011 season still a few months away, I thought it was too early to bust out The Favorite Toy to determine what milestones we might see next year, so I thought I’d go retro and look at some of the game’s greats, not-so-greats and what-might-have-beens to see what odds The Favorite Toy gave […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,4235,5],"tags":[376,6987,21225,9137,12277,12279,460,814,12278,828,9197,1747,12283,1898,2755,1142,12275,1845,7760,1295,556,630,12276,12123],"class_list":["post-9759","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-top-stories","category-statistical-analysis","tag-babe-ruth","tag-bambino","tag-baseball-history","tag-bust","tag-clouts","tag-four-baggers","tag-game","tag-jimmie-foxx","tag-jimmie-rogers","tag-last-game","tag-likelihood","tag-lou-gehrig","tag-max-1","tag-milestones","tag-odds","tag-ops","tag-retro","tag-rogers-hornsby","tag-roundtrippers","tag-runners","tag-slugging-percentage","tag-ted-williams","tag-ted-williams-head","tag-yr-avg"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t